JAYAPURA/PT- On January 8, 2010 Papua receive Form Implementation of the central government budget which has increased from the previous year 2009 only Rp 19.058 trillion, then in 2010 was the Papua received Rp 21.89 trillion or an increase of about USD 2.8 trillion from the central government. In his speech the Governor of Papua Barnabas Suebu, SH said, the total fund of Rp 21.89 trillion from the State Revenues and Expenditures (Budget), among others sourced from a managed budget agencies of central government, the General Allocation Fund (DAU), the Special Allocation Fund (DAK), the Special Autonomy Fund (Autonomy) and Infrastruktut Autonomy Fund.
Delivery of DIPA has a symbolic meaning that is very important, namely that President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono wants the continuity of development which took place without a break, without stopping, in Papua Province. For that there is no reason to delay implementation of the budget in the form of development activities that have been planned in accordance with the stages according to the applicable government regulations, seriously guided by the principles of budget management is accountable, results-oriented, professional, proportionate , and open / transparent. In his speech President Yudhoyono asked the seriousness of all parties to not accumulate disbursements at year-end budget, but disseminate it more proportional to each quarter. That means that the implementation of the budget must be started early in 2010 so that the role of government budget as a stimulus to the economy actually improved efektifivitasnya.
The entire state budget funds in 2010 amounted to USD 1047.6 Trillion consisting of, the central government budget of Rp 725.2 trillion, and transfers to regional budgets amounted to Rp 322.4 Trillion
Of total central government budget, allocated to them, spending Employees Rp 160.3 trillion, spending Rp 107.0 T goods, capital expenditure Rp 82.1 trillion, social assistance and Rp 64.2 trillion debt interest spending, subsidies and spending Other-Other amounted to Rp 30.7 trillion.
Then the total budget allocation of funds for Papua Province, managed by government agencies is central to Rp 5.78 trillion, with the details, shopping Employees Rp 1.60 trillion, spending Rp 1.29 trillion of goods, capital expenditure Rp 1.95 Trillion , and social assistance Trilyun.Lembaga USD $ 0.92 this year the government allocated a large enough budget is the national education department Rp 0.54 trillion, the department of defense Rp 0.61 trillion, the Ministry of Public Works USD 1.44 Trillion, National Police Rp 0.63 trillion, the Ministry of Health amounted to Rp 0.07 trillion, and the Department of Transportation is Rp 0.65 trillion.
National Education Fund Allocation of them will be used for Social Assistance Institute of Education, Office of Education, Youth and Sports of Papua province to Rp 360.5 billion. Allocation of Department of Public Works of which USD 1.3 Trillion, will be used for the construction of roads and bridges, residential infrastructure development, development of water management and environmental health as well as the settlement of natural resource management and other activities on the field of Public Works.
Allocation of funds National Police will be used mostly for police operations throughout the province of Papua. Department of Health Allocation of funds for other than operational expenditure will also be used for the construction of Jayapura Office of Health Polytechnic of Rp 17.5 billion.
As for the Papua province in the fiscal year 2010 funding was obtained allocations that make up the bulk of the Papua Provincial structure as follows: DAU Rp 11.119 trillion with the details of the Papua Province DAU USD 1.148 trillion and DAU County / City of Rp 9.971 trillion. Then Papua Province DAK Rp 1.5 trillion, with details of the Papua Province DAK Rp 75 billion and DAK County / City of Rp 1.453 trillion. Next fund Otsus Rp. 3.49 trillion, which consists of funds from 2 percent of national DAU Rp. 2.69 trillion, and Rp infrastructure funds. 0.8 trillion. Thus, the total of all funds derived from the state budget allocated for the Province of Papua in the Fiscal Year 2010 is Rp. 21.89 trillion.
Read More..
Minggu, 10 Januari 2010
Sabtu, 02 Januari 2010
Jakarta-Papua talk still possible
Neles Tebay,
Despite the killing of Kelly Kwalik by Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police on Dec.16, 2009, at Timika, the capital of Mimika regeny, Papua, the Indonesian government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Pa-puans have not yet shut down the window for dialogue.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is important for both parties to jointly reach a peaceful and negotiated solution to the Papua conflict. From the Papuans side, they have already demonstrated their commitment and willingness for a peaceful dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
The world has witnessed that during and after the Kwalik's burial in Timika town, Papuans were able to calm themselves. They did not retaliate against the police. There was no atrocity initiated by the Papuans. The Papuans have rejected violent approaches, such as killing, for it will never settle the conflict. They have already chosen dialogue as a civilized way to reach a dignified solution to the Papua conflict.
The Papuans publicly announced they wanted to settle the Papua conflict through a civilized way, through a neutral third party, which will mediate the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Kwalik's assassination has even renewed and strengthened their commitment to dialogue, as clearly communicated in the speech of the chairperson of the Papuan Customary Council (DAP).
It is the belief of the Papuans that the Indonesian authority will not keep repeating its violent approach and therefore choose a civilized way, such as dialogue, to settle the Papua conflict. This belief is based on the fact that the government under the leadership of Yudhoyono has successfully settled the government's armed conflict with the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), through a third party-mediated dialogue with the signing of Helsinki Agreement in August 2005.
Yudhoyono has been reelected for the second term of his presidency. Yudhoyono's reelection gives hope that the government under his leadership will handle the Papua conflict through dialogue with the Papuans, as was done in Aceh.
During his first term, Yudhoyono made several public statements announcing the government's commitment to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue.
However, the promised dialogue has not taken place. The Papuans understood well that the President was not able to initiate a dialogue with them because his political party, the Democratic Party, was new and small. Yudhoyono might have been reluctant to settle the Papuan conflict through dialogue because his political support in the House of Representatives was weak and his attention was focused on the implementation of the Helsinki Agreement in Aceh.
For the second term of his presidency, Yudhoyono has very strong political backing in the House. His political party won the April legislative elections and his party has formed coalition with some other big and influential parties. Therefore, there is less possibility for him to face resistance in the House.
Yudhoyono, at the same time as being the head of state and government, is also the Commander-In-Chief of the Indonesian army.
It is in the second term of his presidency, then, that it seems proper for him to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue as all of the country's power now at his disposal.
Yudhoyono's initiative for the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly be supported by the House, the government, and the Indonesian Military (TNI).
That's why the Papuans see that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is still possible, particularly during Yudhoyono's presidency.
Once the Jakarta-based government engages in dialogue with the Papuans, and the Papua conflict is settled without bloodshed, then this peaceful settlement to the conflict would be the Yudhoyono's legacy.
The history of Indonesia will record and tell that he was the only Indonesian president who was able to settle peacefully and permanently, the Papua conflict through dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
Not like in Aceh, where former vice president Jusuf Kalla was also involved, the peaceful settlement to the Papua conflict is and will be the Yudhoyono's work. It will be recognized his own idea.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will really be considered as a manifestation of the Yudhoyono's genuineness and personal initiative.
As a result, he will be recognized internationally as a man of peace. It may even win him a Nobel Peace Price in the years to come.
It is needless to say that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly bring about a good reputation for the country of Indonesia before the eyes of international community. Therefore there is still hope and possibility for the present government to take the initiative for dialogue to settle the Papua conflict.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur school of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua. Read More..
Despite the killing of Kelly Kwalik by Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police on Dec.16, 2009, at Timika, the capital of Mimika regeny, Papua, the Indonesian government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Pa-puans have not yet shut down the window for dialogue.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is important for both parties to jointly reach a peaceful and negotiated solution to the Papua conflict. From the Papuans side, they have already demonstrated their commitment and willingness for a peaceful dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
The world has witnessed that during and after the Kwalik's burial in Timika town, Papuans were able to calm themselves. They did not retaliate against the police. There was no atrocity initiated by the Papuans. The Papuans have rejected violent approaches, such as killing, for it will never settle the conflict. They have already chosen dialogue as a civilized way to reach a dignified solution to the Papua conflict.
The Papuans publicly announced they wanted to settle the Papua conflict through a civilized way, through a neutral third party, which will mediate the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Kwalik's assassination has even renewed and strengthened their commitment to dialogue, as clearly communicated in the speech of the chairperson of the Papuan Customary Council (DAP).
It is the belief of the Papuans that the Indonesian authority will not keep repeating its violent approach and therefore choose a civilized way, such as dialogue, to settle the Papua conflict. This belief is based on the fact that the government under the leadership of Yudhoyono has successfully settled the government's armed conflict with the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), through a third party-mediated dialogue with the signing of Helsinki Agreement in August 2005.
Yudhoyono has been reelected for the second term of his presidency. Yudhoyono's reelection gives hope that the government under his leadership will handle the Papua conflict through dialogue with the Papuans, as was done in Aceh.
During his first term, Yudhoyono made several public statements announcing the government's commitment to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue.
However, the promised dialogue has not taken place. The Papuans understood well that the President was not able to initiate a dialogue with them because his political party, the Democratic Party, was new and small. Yudhoyono might have been reluctant to settle the Papuan conflict through dialogue because his political support in the House of Representatives was weak and his attention was focused on the implementation of the Helsinki Agreement in Aceh.
For the second term of his presidency, Yudhoyono has very strong political backing in the House. His political party won the April legislative elections and his party has formed coalition with some other big and influential parties. Therefore, there is less possibility for him to face resistance in the House.
Yudhoyono, at the same time as being the head of state and government, is also the Commander-In-Chief of the Indonesian army.
It is in the second term of his presidency, then, that it seems proper for him to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue as all of the country's power now at his disposal.
Yudhoyono's initiative for the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly be supported by the House, the government, and the Indonesian Military (TNI).
That's why the Papuans see that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is still possible, particularly during Yudhoyono's presidency.
Once the Jakarta-based government engages in dialogue with the Papuans, and the Papua conflict is settled without bloodshed, then this peaceful settlement to the conflict would be the Yudhoyono's legacy.
The history of Indonesia will record and tell that he was the only Indonesian president who was able to settle peacefully and permanently, the Papua conflict through dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
Not like in Aceh, where former vice president Jusuf Kalla was also involved, the peaceful settlement to the Papua conflict is and will be the Yudhoyono's work. It will be recognized his own idea.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will really be considered as a manifestation of the Yudhoyono's genuineness and personal initiative.
As a result, he will be recognized internationally as a man of peace. It may even win him a Nobel Peace Price in the years to come.
It is needless to say that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly bring about a good reputation for the country of Indonesia before the eyes of international community. Therefore there is still hope and possibility for the present government to take the initiative for dialogue to settle the Papua conflict.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur school of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua. Read More..
Kamis, 31 Desember 2009
Papuan Council Recalls Former President Gus Dur
Head of the council Thaha al Hamid said on Thursday papuans will never forget the swift measure by Gus Dur in December 1999, in approving the use of the original term for their region, Papua, as the official name of province.
The measure replaced the name of Irian, Jaya given during Soeharto presidency, within only two months after the cleric assumed office which remained until now.
During his unfinished term he made two visits to the island in 1999 and 2000 and met with a senior papua leader Theys Hiyo Eluay jailed by the Indonesian authority during the second visit. “Even several times, when we had not visited him so often anymore, Gus Dur would asked and then we would come to visit him. So our contact was maintained even when was no longer holding the presidential post”
The last visit was in 2006 when Gud Dur was out of the office and in which Thaha said, Gus Dur made a plea to the governemnt to name Theys as a national hero.
His figure, Thaha went on, was too extraordinary for Papua and papuans. “We are not just losing a cleric, a former president, and a teacher, but actually we are losing a living scripture. A scripture that continuously giving advise.”
Read More..
The measure replaced the name of Irian, Jaya given during Soeharto presidency, within only two months after the cleric assumed office which remained until now.
During his unfinished term he made two visits to the island in 1999 and 2000 and met with a senior papua leader Theys Hiyo Eluay jailed by the Indonesian authority during the second visit. “Even several times, when we had not visited him so often anymore, Gus Dur would asked and then we would come to visit him. So our contact was maintained even when was no longer holding the presidential post”
The last visit was in 2006 when Gud Dur was out of the office and in which Thaha said, Gus Dur made a plea to the governemnt to name Theys as a national hero.
His figure, Thaha went on, was too extraordinary for Papua and papuans. “We are not just losing a cleric, a former president, and a teacher, but actually we are losing a living scripture. A scripture that continuously giving advise.”
Read More..
Kamis, 24 Desember 2009
The killing of Kelly Kwalik and Papua conflict
Neles Tebay
Kelly Kwalik was recognized as a prominent Papuan leader of the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement (OPM). He resisted Indonesia’s rule over Papua until the last day of his life, Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009.
He was shot to death by the Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police in Timika, the capital of Mimika regency, Papua.
In the absence of Kwalik, the police can easily justify the killing by linking him with allegations of misconduct.
Police might link Kwalik to the series of shootings near Timika over the past six months targeting the operations of the US mining company, Freeport-McMoran.
Kwalik might be accused of having ordered the kidnapping of the two Belgian journalists who were released after two months in 2001.
They might allege he was involved in the killing two US Freeport employees in 2001. The list can be made longer by adding other allegations against Kwalik.
Despite the allegations, he was killed neither during a war nor in an exchange of fire.
Indeed, he was assassinated in a time of peace in a raid conducted by the police.
Since he was assassinated in a time of peace, Kwalik’s death might not be the final goal of the killing.
The killing is simply a means to achieve a certain goal.
Kwalik could have been killed deliberately in order to address a particular problem and to achieve a certain goal. What goals could be achieved through this killing? There are two possibilities:
The first is that Kwalik was possibly killed to put an end to the attacks initiated in June 2009 targeting Freeport mining operations.
Police might have considered Kwalik as the main cause of the attacks, although he denied any responsibility.
Therefore, the police might have decided to eliminate Kwalik to address the security problem within the Freeport concession area.
However, the truth is that despite its investigation, underway since June, the police to date have not been able to identify those parties responsible for the attacks.
Freeport-McMoran Copper and Gold Corporation has long been linked to human rights abuses involving Indonesian troops who secure the company’s facilities.
Making Kwalik a scapegoat then, only serves to mask the failure of Indonesian authorities to credibly resolve the case.
If the above analysis is true, then the killing of Kwalik will not resolve the security problem in the Freeport consession area.
Therefore, sooner or later, the attacks will happen again in the same area, unless all parties demanding protection money from Freeport are satisfied with the huge amount of money.
The second possibility is that Kwalik was assassinated to settle the conflict between the Indonesian government (Jakarta) and the Papuans (Papua) which has been going on from 1963 until today. Police might have considered Kwalik the main cause of the conflict.
Therefore the best way chosen by the police to settle the conflict was by assassinating Kwalik in a raid.
The questions should be: Is it true that Kwalik was the main cause of the conflict between Jakarta and Papua?
In order to answer this question, we need to explore the root cause of the conflict: What is (are) the main cause(s) of the unsettled Papua conflict?
The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) has conducted research for four years on the conflict between Jakarta and Papua and identified, in the book entitled Papua Road Map published in 2009, four main problems as the main causes of the conflict.
The first problem would be the government’s failures in development, particularly in the area of education, health care, infrastructure, and people’s economic development.
Its indicator is that many Papuans remain living under the poverty line, despite the wealth of natural resources in Papua.
Second is the marginalization of, and discrimination against, the indigenous Papuans under Indonesian domination.
Third, the human rights abuses allegedly committed by the Indonesian security forces since May 1, 1963 until today.
The fourth problem is the different interpretation of the history of integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.
As of today the conflict between Jakarta and Papua remains unsettled because these four identified problems have not yet been addressed.
So it would have been a great mistake if Indonesian security forces thought the assassination of Kwalik was the solution to the Papua conflict.
It is necessary for the Indonesian government to be reminded again that the killing of Kwalik and other Papuan rebel leaders will never overcome any of the four identified problems.
Nobody in Papua believes that the assassination of Kwalik settles neither the security problems around the Freeport mining area nor the conflict between the government and the Papuans.
Having rejected the violent approach, the Papuans have already started discussing the possibility of having a neutral, third-party mediated dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Despite the assassination of Kwalik, the Papuans will keep moving toward a dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
In the wake of this killing, will the government finally engage in dialogue with the Papuans to settle the Papua conflict by addressing the four identified problems?
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur School of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua.
Read More..
Kelly Kwalik was recognized as a prominent Papuan leader of the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement (OPM). He resisted Indonesia’s rule over Papua until the last day of his life, Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009.
He was shot to death by the Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police in Timika, the capital of Mimika regency, Papua.
In the absence of Kwalik, the police can easily justify the killing by linking him with allegations of misconduct.
Police might link Kwalik to the series of shootings near Timika over the past six months targeting the operations of the US mining company, Freeport-McMoran.
Kwalik might be accused of having ordered the kidnapping of the two Belgian journalists who were released after two months in 2001.
They might allege he was involved in the killing two US Freeport employees in 2001. The list can be made longer by adding other allegations against Kwalik.
Despite the allegations, he was killed neither during a war nor in an exchange of fire.
Indeed, he was assassinated in a time of peace in a raid conducted by the police.
Since he was assassinated in a time of peace, Kwalik’s death might not be the final goal of the killing.
The killing is simply a means to achieve a certain goal.
Kwalik could have been killed deliberately in order to address a particular problem and to achieve a certain goal. What goals could be achieved through this killing? There are two possibilities:
The first is that Kwalik was possibly killed to put an end to the attacks initiated in June 2009 targeting Freeport mining operations.
Police might have considered Kwalik as the main cause of the attacks, although he denied any responsibility.
Therefore, the police might have decided to eliminate Kwalik to address the security problem within the Freeport concession area.
However, the truth is that despite its investigation, underway since June, the police to date have not been able to identify those parties responsible for the attacks.
Freeport-McMoran Copper and Gold Corporation has long been linked to human rights abuses involving Indonesian troops who secure the company’s facilities.
Making Kwalik a scapegoat then, only serves to mask the failure of Indonesian authorities to credibly resolve the case.
If the above analysis is true, then the killing of Kwalik will not resolve the security problem in the Freeport consession area.
Therefore, sooner or later, the attacks will happen again in the same area, unless all parties demanding protection money from Freeport are satisfied with the huge amount of money.
The second possibility is that Kwalik was assassinated to settle the conflict between the Indonesian government (Jakarta) and the Papuans (Papua) which has been going on from 1963 until today. Police might have considered Kwalik the main cause of the conflict.
Therefore the best way chosen by the police to settle the conflict was by assassinating Kwalik in a raid.
The questions should be: Is it true that Kwalik was the main cause of the conflict between Jakarta and Papua?
In order to answer this question, we need to explore the root cause of the conflict: What is (are) the main cause(s) of the unsettled Papua conflict?
The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) has conducted research for four years on the conflict between Jakarta and Papua and identified, in the book entitled Papua Road Map published in 2009, four main problems as the main causes of the conflict.
The first problem would be the government’s failures in development, particularly in the area of education, health care, infrastructure, and people’s economic development.
Its indicator is that many Papuans remain living under the poverty line, despite the wealth of natural resources in Papua.
Second is the marginalization of, and discrimination against, the indigenous Papuans under Indonesian domination.
Third, the human rights abuses allegedly committed by the Indonesian security forces since May 1, 1963 until today.
The fourth problem is the different interpretation of the history of integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.
As of today the conflict between Jakarta and Papua remains unsettled because these four identified problems have not yet been addressed.
So it would have been a great mistake if Indonesian security forces thought the assassination of Kwalik was the solution to the Papua conflict.
It is necessary for the Indonesian government to be reminded again that the killing of Kwalik and other Papuan rebel leaders will never overcome any of the four identified problems.
Nobody in Papua believes that the assassination of Kwalik settles neither the security problems around the Freeport mining area nor the conflict between the government and the Papuans.
Having rejected the violent approach, the Papuans have already started discussing the possibility of having a neutral, third-party mediated dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Despite the assassination of Kwalik, the Papuans will keep moving toward a dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
In the wake of this killing, will the government finally engage in dialogue with the Papuans to settle the Papua conflict by addressing the four identified problems?
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur School of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua.
Read More..
Rabu, 23 Desember 2009
Deforestation threatens Indonesia's Papua region
Jayapura – Logging and agribusiness is threatening environmental destruction in Indonesia's Papua region, one of the world's last vast wildernesses.The governors of the two provinces in the region on the western end of New Guinea island told an international environmental conference a strategy was needed to avoid the mistakes that have decimated other Indonesian regions.
Kalimat berikutnya
West Papua Governor Abraham Atururi said that pressure and threats to biodiversity in Papua are increasing. Papua is becoming a target for massive agro and forestry industry investment. His government had received an increasing number of requests for development and feared environmental destruction from illegal logging aimed at clearing land for plantations. In this regard, Papua should not repeat the failure to manage forests and biodiversity that has happened in Kalimantan (Borneo) and Sumatra.
In the meantime, The governor of Papua province, which sits on the eastern end of the region, Barnabas Suebu, said preserving the tropical forest-blanketed region was key to helping absorb the gases that cause climate change. The capacity of Papua's 42 million hectares (104 million acres) of forests to process CO2 is equivalent to the carbon footprint of nearly all the population of Europe.
Indonesia, which spreads across over 17,000 islands, has been a key advocate for plans being floated ahead of global climate talks in Copenhagen in December that would see developing countries paid to conserve forests and peatlands. Deforestation, largely on Borneo and Sumatra, has seen the country become the world's third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases
Source : Agence France Presse Read More..
Kalimat berikutnya
West Papua Governor Abraham Atururi said that pressure and threats to biodiversity in Papua are increasing. Papua is becoming a target for massive agro and forestry industry investment. His government had received an increasing number of requests for development and feared environmental destruction from illegal logging aimed at clearing land for plantations. In this regard, Papua should not repeat the failure to manage forests and biodiversity that has happened in Kalimantan (Borneo) and Sumatra.
In the meantime, The governor of Papua province, which sits on the eastern end of the region, Barnabas Suebu, said preserving the tropical forest-blanketed region was key to helping absorb the gases that cause climate change. The capacity of Papua's 42 million hectares (104 million acres) of forests to process CO2 is equivalent to the carbon footprint of nearly all the population of Europe.
Indonesia, which spreads across over 17,000 islands, has been a key advocate for plans being floated ahead of global climate talks in Copenhagen in December that would see developing countries paid to conserve forests and peatlands. Deforestation, largely on Borneo and Sumatra, has seen the country become the world's third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases
Source : Agence France Presse Read More..
Senin, 14 Desember 2009
Landslide kills Freeport employee
Because of deforestation and mining, an employee of mining company PT Freeport died and four others suffered injuries in a landslide at the company’s mining site in Papua on Sunday. The incident took place at the Ridge Camp area at mile 72 (near the Aptonal hill) at about 8:30 pm local time after heavy rains in the area. Five other workers recovered from the ground according to head of the Public Communication unit of Papua Police Agus Rianto were in critical condition. And were being treated at Tembagapura Hospital.
One mining worker in the Freeport McMoran goldminer complex in Papua was killed in a rain triggered landslide on Sunday night which also injured four of five other workers.
Spokesman for Freeport McMoran, Mindo Pangaribuan confirmed the accident but said only four other workers we injured in the accident.
Source : The Jakarta Post , Tempo interactive
BAHASA INDONESIA
Tanah Longsor membunuh karyawan Freeport
Karena penggundulan hutan dan pertambangan, seorang karyawan dari perusahaan pertambangan PT Freeport tewas dan empat lainnya menderita luka-luka dalam tanah longsor di lokasi pertambangan perusahaan di Papua pada hari Minggu. Insiden terjadi di kawasan di Ridge Camp mil 72 (dekat bukit Aptonal) sekitar pukul 8:30 waktu setempat setelah hujan lebat di daerah tersebut. Lima pekerja lain pulih dari tanah menurut Kepala Unit Komunikasi Publik Papua Polisi Agus Rianto berada dalam kondisi kritis. Dan sedang dirawat di Rumah Sakit Tembagapura.
Salah satu pekerja di pertambangan Freeport McMoran di Papua goldminer kompleks tewas dalam tanah longsor dipicu hujan pada Minggu malam yang juga melukai empat dari lima pekerja lain.
Juru bicara Freeport McMoran, Mindo Pangaribuan membenarkan kecelakaan tetapi mengatakan hanya empat pekerja lain kita terluka dalam kecelakaan. Read More..
One mining worker in the Freeport McMoran goldminer complex in Papua was killed in a rain triggered landslide on Sunday night which also injured four of five other workers.
Spokesman for Freeport McMoran, Mindo Pangaribuan confirmed the accident but said only four other workers we injured in the accident.
Source : The Jakarta Post , Tempo interactive
BAHASA INDONESIA
Tanah Longsor membunuh karyawan Freeport
Karena penggundulan hutan dan pertambangan, seorang karyawan dari perusahaan pertambangan PT Freeport tewas dan empat lainnya menderita luka-luka dalam tanah longsor di lokasi pertambangan perusahaan di Papua pada hari Minggu. Insiden terjadi di kawasan di Ridge Camp mil 72 (dekat bukit Aptonal) sekitar pukul 8:30 waktu setempat setelah hujan lebat di daerah tersebut. Lima pekerja lain pulih dari tanah menurut Kepala Unit Komunikasi Publik Papua Polisi Agus Rianto berada dalam kondisi kritis. Dan sedang dirawat di Rumah Sakit Tembagapura.
Salah satu pekerja di pertambangan Freeport McMoran di Papua goldminer kompleks tewas dalam tanah longsor dipicu hujan pada Minggu malam yang juga melukai empat dari lima pekerja lain.
Juru bicara Freeport McMoran, Mindo Pangaribuan membenarkan kecelakaan tetapi mengatakan hanya empat pekerja lain kita terluka dalam kecelakaan. Read More..
Decentralization jeopardizes forest in Papua
Nethy Dharma Somba
Regional autonomy in Papua poses a threat to forests in the province because the infrastructure development following autonomy would exploit forested areas, says a forestry official.
"The forested areas currently available would unlikely still be there five to 10 years from now if regional autonomy continues as it would lead to physical development," said Papua Forestry Office head Marthen Kayoi, during the launch of the Forest Governance Integrity (FGI) at the Transparency International Indonesia office in Jayapura recently. He added that the regency capital of Keerom was previously a forested area but raised doubts whether it could still be described as such.
The current area of Papua's intact forest is 31.5 million hectares, while 5 million hectares had been categorized as critical areas from 1973 to 2003. Kayoi said only around 24 million hectares of the forested areas would remain given the pace of regional autonomy, which has so far produced 33 regencies and municipalities. This is what's happening now. The continuing process of regional autonomy, followed by infrastructure development would further reduce the size of forested areas he said. We also could not ensure whether the remaining forested areas would exist in the next five years.
The government has designated a 4,825,786-hectare forested area in Papua as a conservation forest, or natural preserve. However, for the past several years it has received pressure in the form of conversion into farmland, settlement and infrastructure development including illegal logging. The Lorentz National Park, a protected area that has now encompassed seven regencies, including the giant PT Freeport Indonesia gold and copper mining company, due to the impact of regional autonomy.
Marthen has urged every party, including Transparency International (TI) Indonesia, which is now present in Papua, to organize the forest in a wise manner for the sake of Papuan forest sustainability. This is a challenge for the forestry office to carry out development effectively, he said. TI's presence in Papua, said FGI Asia Pacific regional manager Agustinus Taufik, urged every party to fight illegal forestry practices. With the principle of united we stand, we could develop a community that is mentally and spiritually sound for the sake of mutual prosperity, Agustinus said. Agustinus said Papua's forest is one of the best tropical rainforests in Indonesia and serves as the lungs of the earth.
Papua's forest is a valuable asset that must be managed well to improve the quality of the ecosystem and the well-being of people in Papua in particular and in Indonesia in general.
Source : , The Jakarta Post
BAHASA INDONESIA
Desentralisasi mengancam hutan di Papua
Nethy Dharma Somba
Otonomi daerah di Papua menimbulkan ancaman bagi hutan di provinsi karena pembangunan infrastruktur berikut akan mengeksploitasi hutan otonomi daerah, kata seorang pejabat kehutanan.
"Para wilayah hutan yang tersedia saat ini tidak mungkin akan tetap ada lima hingga 10 tahun dari sekarang jika otonomi daerah terus karena akan mengarah pada pembangunan fisik," kata Kepala Dinas Kehutanan Papua Marthen Kayoi, pada peluncuran Tata Kelola Hutan Integritas (FGI) di Transparency International Indonesia di kantor di Jayapura baru-baru ini. Dia menambahkan bahwa ibukota Kabupaten Keerom sebelumnya sebuah kawasan hutan tetapi mengangkat keraguan apakah masih bisa digambarkan seperti itu.
Daerah saat ini utuh Papua hutan adalah 31,5 juta hektar, sementara 5 juta hektar telah dikategorikan sebagai daerah kritis 1973-2003. Kayoi mengatakan hanya sekitar 24 juta hektar dari kawasan hutan akan tetap mengingat laju otonomi daerah, yang sejauh ini telah menghasilkan 33 kabupaten dan kotamadya. Ini adalah apa yang terjadi sekarang. Proses yang terus-menerus otonomi daerah, diikuti dengan pembangunan infrastruktur akan semakin mengurangi ukuran wilayah hutan katanya. Kami juga tidak bisa memastikan apakah kawasan hutan yang tersisa akan ada dalam lima tahun.
Pemerintah telah menunjuk seorang 4.825.786 hektar kawasan hutan di Papua sebagai hutan konservasi, atau melestarikan alam. Namun, selama beberapa tahun ini telah menerima tekanan dalam bentuk konversi menjadi lahan pertanian, pemukiman dan pembangunan infrastruktur, termasuk pembalakan liar. Taman Nasional Lorentz, sebuah kawasan lindung yang sekarang meliputi tujuh kabupaten, termasuk PT Freeport Indonesia raksasa emas dan tembaga perusahaan tambang, karena dampak dari otonomi daerah.
Marthen telah mendesak semua pihak, termasuk Transparency International (TI) Indonesia yang kini hadir di Papua, untuk mengatur hutan dengan cara yang bijaksana demi kelestarian hutan Papua. Ini adalah tantangan bagi kantor kehutanan untuk melaksanakan pembangunan secara efektif, katanya. Kehadiran TI di Papua, kata FGI manajer regional Asia Pasifik Agustinus Taufik, mendesak semua pihak untuk memerangi praktek-praktek kehutanan yang ilegal. Dengan prinsip bersatu kita teguh, kita bisa mengembangkan komunitas yang sehat secara mental dan spiritual demi kesejahteraan bersama, kata Agustinus. Agustinus mengatakan hutan Papua merupakan salah satu hutan hujan tropis terbaik di Indonesia dan berfungsi sebagai paru-paru bumi.
Hutan Papua adalah aset berharga yang harus dikelola dengan baik untuk meningkatkan kualitas ekosistem dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di Papua khususnya dan di Indonesia pada umumnya.
Read More..
Regional autonomy in Papua poses a threat to forests in the province because the infrastructure development following autonomy would exploit forested areas, says a forestry official.
"The forested areas currently available would unlikely still be there five to 10 years from now if regional autonomy continues as it would lead to physical development," said Papua Forestry Office head Marthen Kayoi, during the launch of the Forest Governance Integrity (FGI) at the Transparency International Indonesia office in Jayapura recently. He added that the regency capital of Keerom was previously a forested area but raised doubts whether it could still be described as such.
The current area of Papua's intact forest is 31.5 million hectares, while 5 million hectares had been categorized as critical areas from 1973 to 2003. Kayoi said only around 24 million hectares of the forested areas would remain given the pace of regional autonomy, which has so far produced 33 regencies and municipalities. This is what's happening now. The continuing process of regional autonomy, followed by infrastructure development would further reduce the size of forested areas he said. We also could not ensure whether the remaining forested areas would exist in the next five years.
The government has designated a 4,825,786-hectare forested area in Papua as a conservation forest, or natural preserve. However, for the past several years it has received pressure in the form of conversion into farmland, settlement and infrastructure development including illegal logging. The Lorentz National Park, a protected area that has now encompassed seven regencies, including the giant PT Freeport Indonesia gold and copper mining company, due to the impact of regional autonomy.
Marthen has urged every party, including Transparency International (TI) Indonesia, which is now present in Papua, to organize the forest in a wise manner for the sake of Papuan forest sustainability. This is a challenge for the forestry office to carry out development effectively, he said. TI's presence in Papua, said FGI Asia Pacific regional manager Agustinus Taufik, urged every party to fight illegal forestry practices. With the principle of united we stand, we could develop a community that is mentally and spiritually sound for the sake of mutual prosperity, Agustinus said. Agustinus said Papua's forest is one of the best tropical rainforests in Indonesia and serves as the lungs of the earth.
Papua's forest is a valuable asset that must be managed well to improve the quality of the ecosystem and the well-being of people in Papua in particular and in Indonesia in general.
Source : , The Jakarta Post
BAHASA INDONESIA
Desentralisasi mengancam hutan di Papua
Nethy Dharma Somba
Otonomi daerah di Papua menimbulkan ancaman bagi hutan di provinsi karena pembangunan infrastruktur berikut akan mengeksploitasi hutan otonomi daerah, kata seorang pejabat kehutanan.
"Para wilayah hutan yang tersedia saat ini tidak mungkin akan tetap ada lima hingga 10 tahun dari sekarang jika otonomi daerah terus karena akan mengarah pada pembangunan fisik," kata Kepala Dinas Kehutanan Papua Marthen Kayoi, pada peluncuran Tata Kelola Hutan Integritas (FGI) di Transparency International Indonesia di kantor di Jayapura baru-baru ini. Dia menambahkan bahwa ibukota Kabupaten Keerom sebelumnya sebuah kawasan hutan tetapi mengangkat keraguan apakah masih bisa digambarkan seperti itu.
Daerah saat ini utuh Papua hutan adalah 31,5 juta hektar, sementara 5 juta hektar telah dikategorikan sebagai daerah kritis 1973-2003. Kayoi mengatakan hanya sekitar 24 juta hektar dari kawasan hutan akan tetap mengingat laju otonomi daerah, yang sejauh ini telah menghasilkan 33 kabupaten dan kotamadya. Ini adalah apa yang terjadi sekarang. Proses yang terus-menerus otonomi daerah, diikuti dengan pembangunan infrastruktur akan semakin mengurangi ukuran wilayah hutan katanya. Kami juga tidak bisa memastikan apakah kawasan hutan yang tersisa akan ada dalam lima tahun.
Pemerintah telah menunjuk seorang 4.825.786 hektar kawasan hutan di Papua sebagai hutan konservasi, atau melestarikan alam. Namun, selama beberapa tahun ini telah menerima tekanan dalam bentuk konversi menjadi lahan pertanian, pemukiman dan pembangunan infrastruktur, termasuk pembalakan liar. Taman Nasional Lorentz, sebuah kawasan lindung yang sekarang meliputi tujuh kabupaten, termasuk PT Freeport Indonesia raksasa emas dan tembaga perusahaan tambang, karena dampak dari otonomi daerah.
Marthen telah mendesak semua pihak, termasuk Transparency International (TI) Indonesia yang kini hadir di Papua, untuk mengatur hutan dengan cara yang bijaksana demi kelestarian hutan Papua. Ini adalah tantangan bagi kantor kehutanan untuk melaksanakan pembangunan secara efektif, katanya. Kehadiran TI di Papua, kata FGI manajer regional Asia Pasifik Agustinus Taufik, mendesak semua pihak untuk memerangi praktek-praktek kehutanan yang ilegal. Dengan prinsip bersatu kita teguh, kita bisa mengembangkan komunitas yang sehat secara mental dan spiritual demi kesejahteraan bersama, kata Agustinus. Agustinus mengatakan hutan Papua merupakan salah satu hutan hujan tropis terbaik di Indonesia dan berfungsi sebagai paru-paru bumi.
Hutan Papua adalah aset berharga yang harus dikelola dengan baik untuk meningkatkan kualitas ekosistem dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di Papua khususnya dan di Indonesia pada umumnya.
Read More..
Jumat, 11 Desember 2009
Border in Papua Disputed
Around 200 residents of Ugimba, Paniai regency in Papua, yesterday insisted that the Mimika Regent resolve the issue concerning the border between Mimia and Paniai regencies.
Those who claimed to be the owners of the communal land rights of the Grassberg area have demanded compensation for PT Freeport Indonesia’s mining operations. They also insisted the Mimika regional government resolve this issue with the Papua governor using customary laws. “This has been discussed with Mimika regent,” said one protestor, Samuel Tabuni. The Mimika regent, Klemen Tinal, said the government was ready to facilitate a meeting between Ugimba residents and the Papua governor. When the Mimika Regency was set up in 2000, the residents of Ugimba were included in the Mimika Regency area.
Source : TEMPO Interactive
Bahasa
Perbatasan di Papua dipertentangkan
Sekitar 200 warga Ugimba, Kabupaten Paniai di Papua, kemarin menegaskan bahwa Bupati Mimika menyelesaikan masalah mengenai perbatasan antara kabupaten Mimia dan Paniai.
Mereka yang mengaku sebagai pemilik hak atas tanah komunal dari wilayah Grassberg menuntut kompensasi untuk PT Freeport Indonesia operasi pertambangan. Mereka juga menegaskan pemerintah daerah Mimika mengatasi masalah ini dengan Gubernur Papua dengan menggunakan hukum adat. "Hal ini telah didiskusikan dengan Bupati Mimika," kata salah seorang protestor, Samuel Tabuni. Para Bupati Mimika, Klemen Tinal, mengatakan pemerintah siap untuk memfasilitasi pertemuan antara warga dan Ugimba Gubernur Papua. Ketika Kabupaten Mimika didirikan pada tahun 2000, penduduk Ugimba dilibatkan dalam wilayah Kabupaten Mimika.
Read More..
Those who claimed to be the owners of the communal land rights of the Grassberg area have demanded compensation for PT Freeport Indonesia’s mining operations. They also insisted the Mimika regional government resolve this issue with the Papua governor using customary laws. “This has been discussed with Mimika regent,” said one protestor, Samuel Tabuni. The Mimika regent, Klemen Tinal, said the government was ready to facilitate a meeting between Ugimba residents and the Papua governor. When the Mimika Regency was set up in 2000, the residents of Ugimba were included in the Mimika Regency area.
Source : TEMPO Interactive
Bahasa
Perbatasan di Papua dipertentangkan
Sekitar 200 warga Ugimba, Kabupaten Paniai di Papua, kemarin menegaskan bahwa Bupati Mimika menyelesaikan masalah mengenai perbatasan antara kabupaten Mimia dan Paniai.
Mereka yang mengaku sebagai pemilik hak atas tanah komunal dari wilayah Grassberg menuntut kompensasi untuk PT Freeport Indonesia operasi pertambangan. Mereka juga menegaskan pemerintah daerah Mimika mengatasi masalah ini dengan Gubernur Papua dengan menggunakan hukum adat. "Hal ini telah didiskusikan dengan Bupati Mimika," kata salah seorang protestor, Samuel Tabuni. Para Bupati Mimika, Klemen Tinal, mengatakan pemerintah siap untuk memfasilitasi pertemuan antara warga dan Ugimba Gubernur Papua. Ketika Kabupaten Mimika didirikan pada tahun 2000, penduduk Ugimba dilibatkan dalam wilayah Kabupaten Mimika.
Read More..
Papuans Demand Restoration of Violated Rights
Hundreds of people in Papua joined a rally on Thursday (10/12) to mark the Human Rights Day in different locations in the seat of the capital, Jayapura. Participants denounced human rights violations by the government and multinational companies operating in the province including goldminer Freeport McMoran.
The rallies started at about 9 am local time in Abepura district, followed by a rally outside the provincial regional House of Represenatatives in Jayapura were residents handover 11 demand to provincial lawmakers.
Some of the demands are urging the government to halt all investments in the province that reduce or completely robbed the rights of indigenous tribe. A second demand was pressing the provincial authorities to conduct complete assessment on security policy and the size of military force in the island. The next one was pushing the introduction of regional regulation for the legalbasis to restore the rights of victims of human rights violation.
Police deployed around 200 personnel to maintain security during the protest which ended after protesters met with regional lawmakers.
Source : TEMPO Interactive
Bahasa
Papua Menuntut Pemulihan Pelanggaran Hak Azasi
Ratusan orang di Papua bergabung dengan sebuah rally pada hari Kamis (10/12) untuk menandai Hari Hak Asasi Manusia di berbagai lokasi di kursi ibukota, Jayapura. Peserta mengecam pelanggaran hak asasi manusia oleh pemerintah dan perusahaan-perusahaan multinasional beroperasi di provinsi ini termasuk goldminer Freeport McMoran.
Para aksi unjuk rasa dimulai pada sekitar 9 am waktu setempat di distrik Abepura, diikuti oleh sebuah reli di luar daerah provinsi Rumah Represenatatives di Jayapura adalah penduduk serah terima permintaan untuk 11 anggota parlemen provinsi.
Beberapa tuntutan yang mendesak pemerintah untuk menghentikan semua investasi di provinsi yang mengurangi atau sama sekali dirampok hak-hak suku asli. Permintaan kedua adalah menekan pemerintah provinsi untuk melakukan penilaian lengkap pada kebijakan keamanan dan ukuran kekuatan militer di pulau ini. Berikutnya adalah mendorong pengenalan peraturan daerah untuk legalbasis untuk mengembalikan hak-hak korban pelanggaran hak asasi manusia.
Polisi dikerahkan sekitar 200 personil untuk menjaga keamanan selama protes yang berakhir setelah pengunjuk rasa bertemu dengan anggota parlemen daerah.
Read More..
The rallies started at about 9 am local time in Abepura district, followed by a rally outside the provincial regional House of Represenatatives in Jayapura were residents handover 11 demand to provincial lawmakers.
Some of the demands are urging the government to halt all investments in the province that reduce or completely robbed the rights of indigenous tribe. A second demand was pressing the provincial authorities to conduct complete assessment on security policy and the size of military force in the island. The next one was pushing the introduction of regional regulation for the legalbasis to restore the rights of victims of human rights violation.
Police deployed around 200 personnel to maintain security during the protest which ended after protesters met with regional lawmakers.
Source : TEMPO Interactive
Bahasa
Papua Menuntut Pemulihan Pelanggaran Hak Azasi
Ratusan orang di Papua bergabung dengan sebuah rally pada hari Kamis (10/12) untuk menandai Hari Hak Asasi Manusia di berbagai lokasi di kursi ibukota, Jayapura. Peserta mengecam pelanggaran hak asasi manusia oleh pemerintah dan perusahaan-perusahaan multinasional beroperasi di provinsi ini termasuk goldminer Freeport McMoran.
Para aksi unjuk rasa dimulai pada sekitar 9 am waktu setempat di distrik Abepura, diikuti oleh sebuah reli di luar daerah provinsi Rumah Represenatatives di Jayapura adalah penduduk serah terima permintaan untuk 11 anggota parlemen provinsi.
Beberapa tuntutan yang mendesak pemerintah untuk menghentikan semua investasi di provinsi yang mengurangi atau sama sekali dirampok hak-hak suku asli. Permintaan kedua adalah menekan pemerintah provinsi untuk melakukan penilaian lengkap pada kebijakan keamanan dan ukuran kekuatan militer di pulau ini. Berikutnya adalah mendorong pengenalan peraturan daerah untuk legalbasis untuk mengembalikan hak-hak korban pelanggaran hak asasi manusia.
Polisi dikerahkan sekitar 200 personil untuk menjaga keamanan selama protes yang berakhir setelah pengunjuk rasa bertemu dengan anggota parlemen daerah.
Read More..
Minggu, 06 Desember 2009
Mr.Benny Wenda always sell his liar about Papua
Mr Wenda who claimed himself as the great leader of West Papua made another super claim as the voice of 250 tribe. He said that West Papua is Western Half of the New Guinea Island North of Australia, Home of Birth of paradise, but today home of Military. Indonesia Military & Police committed crime humanity in West Papua, everyday killing, rape, intimidation, torturing, and Imprisonment. He also mentioned that when West Papuan People made a peaceful demonstration, Indonesia Military and Police always came and stopped the demonstrator and arrest them, torture them put them in the prison very long time without any trial. Please check yourself by visiting Papua and you will find the peaceful land of Papua without any condition that Benny has accused in his speech at every corner of the United Kingdom.
Benny the great leader of West Papua is a Liar. He lies with his heart and never really think about the progress in West Papua. Indonesia is a democratic country, and you have to prove it by seeing it directly with your eyes and not from what Benny has said so.
Why should smart people in UK and Holland believe what Benny said without crosscheck to reliable sources and if possible just see it with your own eyes. West Papuan people need your help to see the situation in reality and not lies. Mr. Wenda just thinking about his interest to earn money, popularity and never thinking about how to find solution in Papua. So we must carefully when read information about Papua, because we must crosscheck true or false.
Read More..
Benny the great leader of West Papua is a Liar. He lies with his heart and never really think about the progress in West Papua. Indonesia is a democratic country, and you have to prove it by seeing it directly with your eyes and not from what Benny has said so.
Why should smart people in UK and Holland believe what Benny said without crosscheck to reliable sources and if possible just see it with your own eyes. West Papuan people need your help to see the situation in reality and not lies. Mr. Wenda just thinking about his interest to earn money, popularity and never thinking about how to find solution in Papua. So we must carefully when read information about Papua, because we must crosscheck true or false.
Read More..
Selasa, 01 Desember 2009
Meaning of Nationalism in Papua
[Jayapura] Indonesian nationalism in the local political context of Papua, not just kiss the flag of Red and White, memorized the Pancasila and the Constitution of 1945, joined the flag ceremony every August 17. But the nationalism of indigenous peoples Indonesia Papua is a free school, the light is not extinguished, prosperity, good health services, clean water, forests awake, social justice and economic justice manifested.
According to the Secretary General of the Papua Presidium Council (PDP) Alhamid Moh Taha, Indonesian nationalism to the people of Papua is respect for human rights (Human Rights) as guarantee the rights of life and cultural rights can be enforced. Each person gets the same value in public bureaucracies also clean of corruption .. Autonomy is expected to provide all the requirements expected by the people of Papua. Flag of Papua New to be in the Raise the flag of the right to life, social welfare, respect for human rights, social justice and fairness and not the flag a symbol of a movement. Optimization of Law No. 21 / 2001 regarding Special Autonomy should be based on seriously with a strong commitment between local government, central government, all stakeholders, leaders and religious leaders and people of Papua to build and welfare of Papua.
Autonomy with based on a shared commitment to promote Papua, can be a solution to solve complex problems in Papua, which is increasingly difficult to solve. Penyelesaiannyapun takes a long time, because of corruption, illegal logging, looting natural resources in Papua, intimidation and violence that arise both by the OPM and the security forces, the solution requires strong cooperation of all stake holders involved. Development, education and welfare a priority for local governments for welfare of the people of Papua in order to reduce provocation "independence of Papua" is always used by groups who deliberately makes the issue of Papua for the benefit of the group.
Arti Nasionalisme di Papua
[JAYAPURA] Nasionalisme Indonesia dalam konteks politik lokal Papua, bukan sekadar cium bendera Merah Putih, hafal Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, ikut upacara bendera setiap 17 Agustus. Tetapi nasionalisme Indonesia bagi masyarakat asli Papua adalah sekolah gratis, lampu tidak padam, kesejahteraan, pelayanan kesehatan baik, air bersih, hutan terjaga, keadilan sosial dan keadilan ekonomi terwujud.
Menurut Sekretaris Jenderal Presidium Dewan Papua (PDP) Thaha Moh Alhamid, nasionalisme Indonesia bagi rakyat Papua adalah penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia (HAM) seperti memperoleh jaminan hak hidup dan hak-hak budaya bisa ditegakkan. Setiap orang mendapat nilai yang sama didepan umum juga birokrasi yang bersih dari korupsi.. Otsus diharapkan dapat memberikan segala kebutuhan yang diharapkan oleh rakyat Papua. Bendera Papua Baru yang mesti di kibarkan adalah bendera hak hidup, kesejahteraan rakyat, penghormatan hak asasi manusia, keadilan sosial dan keadilan dan bukan bendera simbol suatu gerakan. Optimalisasi UU No 21/ 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus perlu dilakukan secara serius dengan didasari komitmen kuat antara pemerintah daerah, pemerintah pusat, seluruh stakeholders, tokoh dan pemuka agama serta rakyat Papua untuk membangun dan mensejahterakan Papua.
Otsus dengan didasari komitmen bersama untuk memajukan Papua, dapat menjadi solusi untuk menyelesaikan kompleksnya persoalan di Papua yang semakin hari semakin sulit dipecahkan. Penyelesaiannyapun membutuhkan waktu yang tidak sebentar, karena pemberantasan korupsi, illegal logging, penjarahan kekayaan alam di Papua, intimidasi dan kekerasan yang muncul baik oleh OPM dan aparat keamanan , penyelesaiannya membutuhkan kerjasama kuat seluruh stake holders yang terlibat. Pembangunan, pendidikan dan kesejahteraan menjadi prioritas bagi pemerintah daerah untuk mensejahterakan rakyat Papua sehingga dapat mereduksi provokasi “kemerdekaan Papua” yang selalu digunakan oleh kelompok-kelompok yang sengaja menjadikan isu Papua untuk kepentingan kelompoknya.
Read More..
According to the Secretary General of the Papua Presidium Council (PDP) Alhamid Moh Taha, Indonesian nationalism to the people of Papua is respect for human rights (Human Rights) as guarantee the rights of life and cultural rights can be enforced. Each person gets the same value in public bureaucracies also clean of corruption .. Autonomy is expected to provide all the requirements expected by the people of Papua. Flag of Papua New to be in the Raise the flag of the right to life, social welfare, respect for human rights, social justice and fairness and not the flag a symbol of a movement. Optimization of Law No. 21 / 2001 regarding Special Autonomy should be based on seriously with a strong commitment between local government, central government, all stakeholders, leaders and religious leaders and people of Papua to build and welfare of Papua.
Autonomy with based on a shared commitment to promote Papua, can be a solution to solve complex problems in Papua, which is increasingly difficult to solve. Penyelesaiannyapun takes a long time, because of corruption, illegal logging, looting natural resources in Papua, intimidation and violence that arise both by the OPM and the security forces, the solution requires strong cooperation of all stake holders involved. Development, education and welfare a priority for local governments for welfare of the people of Papua in order to reduce provocation "independence of Papua" is always used by groups who deliberately makes the issue of Papua for the benefit of the group.
Arti Nasionalisme di Papua
[JAYAPURA] Nasionalisme Indonesia dalam konteks politik lokal Papua, bukan sekadar cium bendera Merah Putih, hafal Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, ikut upacara bendera setiap 17 Agustus. Tetapi nasionalisme Indonesia bagi masyarakat asli Papua adalah sekolah gratis, lampu tidak padam, kesejahteraan, pelayanan kesehatan baik, air bersih, hutan terjaga, keadilan sosial dan keadilan ekonomi terwujud.
Menurut Sekretaris Jenderal Presidium Dewan Papua (PDP) Thaha Moh Alhamid, nasionalisme Indonesia bagi rakyat Papua adalah penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia (HAM) seperti memperoleh jaminan hak hidup dan hak-hak budaya bisa ditegakkan. Setiap orang mendapat nilai yang sama didepan umum juga birokrasi yang bersih dari korupsi.. Otsus diharapkan dapat memberikan segala kebutuhan yang diharapkan oleh rakyat Papua. Bendera Papua Baru yang mesti di kibarkan adalah bendera hak hidup, kesejahteraan rakyat, penghormatan hak asasi manusia, keadilan sosial dan keadilan dan bukan bendera simbol suatu gerakan. Optimalisasi UU No 21/ 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus perlu dilakukan secara serius dengan didasari komitmen kuat antara pemerintah daerah, pemerintah pusat, seluruh stakeholders, tokoh dan pemuka agama serta rakyat Papua untuk membangun dan mensejahterakan Papua.
Otsus dengan didasari komitmen bersama untuk memajukan Papua, dapat menjadi solusi untuk menyelesaikan kompleksnya persoalan di Papua yang semakin hari semakin sulit dipecahkan. Penyelesaiannyapun membutuhkan waktu yang tidak sebentar, karena pemberantasan korupsi, illegal logging, penjarahan kekayaan alam di Papua, intimidasi dan kekerasan yang muncul baik oleh OPM dan aparat keamanan , penyelesaiannya membutuhkan kerjasama kuat seluruh stake holders yang terlibat. Pembangunan, pendidikan dan kesejahteraan menjadi prioritas bagi pemerintah daerah untuk mensejahterakan rakyat Papua sehingga dapat mereduksi provokasi “kemerdekaan Papua” yang selalu digunakan oleh kelompok-kelompok yang sengaja menjadikan isu Papua untuk kepentingan kelompoknya.
Read More..
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
