Written by Lambang Triyono,
Peace in Papua still faces many obstacles, although there is also opportunity and hope. Papua is still vulnerable to the conflicts (prone to conflict), particularly separatist conflict, as well as local conflicts due to other unsolved problems of injustice and inequality of development, and political resistance associated with central policies that are counterproductive to the implementation of the Papua Special Autonomy . Still vulnerable conflict preventing peace in Papua, especially related to the following issues.
First, inequality, inequality and injustice of development in Papua. Included here is the disparity among regions and communities, between communities cities and the countryside, or the new settlers and indigenous people, in access to development. The potential conflict will be even greater if the gap is even more sharply is not resolved by the development, particularly policies Autonomy available. Especially not improved, or has not resolved the various socio-economic problems in rural areas, residents in the villages and districts that are still isolated by development, Otsus policies, or policies other centers, will make them accessible, which later became closer, to organizations independent Papua (OPM) which promises a better life for them.
Second, the implementation of Autonomy, with a mandate specifically to promote the indigenous Papuans and supported by the majority of Papuans, was still very weak and not satisfactory, yet supported institutional strengthening, MRP, adequate, and not able to improve the quality of life for the majority of Papuans, particularly in rural areas , the villages and districts. The majority of Papuans support Otsus, or Pro-Autonomy, be disappointed, if the central policy counterproductive or weaken Otsus, remain in effect, further increasing the bargaining power movement OPM continues to haunt them.
Third, OPM issues untouched, even by Autonomy though. They so far have not received Autonomy, and continued to launch an armed movement, although sporadic, disorganized, such as in Aceh, no representation or special support of the distribution of political seeds of Papua independence movement in the international and national levels. Peace without touching or involving the groups in conflict, especially the hard-liners in the conflict, such as OPM and its supporters, can not be realized. Peace in Aceh prove it, worked because the GAM signed in it, even though the original was so hard to do.
Fourth, because there is still sporadic, the OPM is not organized, and also because of the complexity of the conflict dynamics, associated with the many factions in the conflict due to the development gaps, lack of Autonomy, and counterproductive policy toward Otsus centers, such as conflicts of migrants and natives, the group Pro-Autonomy, could complicate the formation of groups representing the interests of Papua in a negotiation, dialogue or peace. Peace can only be done if there is representation adequate. In the case of Papua, Papua formation of groups representing very difficult, due to a mosaic of actors have conflict, and the complex linkages between the factions of the conflict there.
Fifth, related to the peace efforts still lack, or absence of systematic efforts and steps, on purpose, and direction done for peace of Papua. The central government itself has not committed to open dialogue, while in the area is also not developed an initiative seeking negotiations, dialogue and peace. Diplomatic efforts and opened negotiations or dialogue, especially with the OPM, has so far not done. Meanwhile, Autonomy policy that allows for open dialogue is not directed there, so that Papua ahead is still very vulnerable to the conflict.
Read More..
Rabu, 24 Maret 2010
Minggu, 21 Maret 2010
DIALOG PAPUA-JAKARTA: Still Full Suspicion & Concerns
by: andawat.papua
Now the issue of dialogue revolving so fast that sometimes some things of substance and some of the terms have not been agreed upon, refined, standardized and well understood in conjunction with already developed with a variety of perceptions. Technically this is still a lot of things that must be considered in order not to affect the substance and purpose of dialogue.
Dialogue Papua Jakarta have multiple interpretations. People arguing for the word of Papua or Jakarta first, there is the opinion of Papua said first mentioned to indicate where they are. When called dialogue Papua Jakarta there is a direct mean to the national dialogue, to participate call the press and the national dialogue as a developing news. Words as Papua and Jakarta were actually shown in 2 subjects and political territories in conflict: Papua and Jakarta. Jakarta as a center of power from the Indonesian government is continuously assessed heart failure in making and integrating Papua into Indonesia also ignores the existence of the Papuans even psychologically Jakarta is the personification of the oppressor group. While Papua entity represents the area and always had the practice of injustice, state violence, oppression, and sacrificed for the interests of Indonesia.
So that when called Dialogue Papua Jakarta indirectly defines the type of dialogue as a national dialogue. The demand for third party involvement and / or international parties or committed abroad, and given the title of an international dialogue that dialogue remains Papua and Jakarta. So the involvement of third-party claims and or international parties framed in an effort to inspire trust, neutrality and objectivity. Help create the conditions and situations that facilitate the process of dialogue rather than backing one party.
Bids dialogue also will be faced with a referendum issue by some groups of pro-independence papua. This is because there is still uncertainty about the dialogue and the perception of the referendum. Dialogue should be understood as a way to communicate problems, formulate and make choices. While the referendum or too NKRI, OTSUS etc. It is the result or the option of dialogue. So of course to put the dialog box is not equal to the box to put the referendum, the Republic of Indonesia, OTSUS or other options. Dialogue is a way or a way to arrive at the following boxes are. Referendum issue will also be exploited by groups that are pro-Republic of Indonesia to maintain the conflict among the papua.
Group wishes to support the dialogue must remain enriched by the realities and possibilities - possibilities that will be encountered. Because there is his hope that the dialogue is the last option to negotiate with Indonesia so worried if then the dialog will fail (again). There is also a very quick thinking and have more technical determine the location of the dialog or negotiator or a third party that argues that dialogue must be done quickly. There was a very agree but do not understand how to start and contribute to the dialogue that leave the task to the team formed by LIPI and Father Neles Tebay. Of course among the various expectations that have been there, there is also suspicion, rejection and even the campaign against the dialogue that continues to grow, so must be managed properly in order to support a growing dialogue. Campaigns pro dialogue should be done with a synergy through various opportunities available and made on purpose.
LIPI and Father Neles Tebay has initiated the meeting in Singapore last November 2009 with the involvement of NGO activists, youth, students, indigenous leaders and the next group of scholars formed papua Peace Network (JDP). JDP main agenda is to disseminate the concept of dialogue and gather input from the community of the dialogue bid. Efforts to internalize the support of the dialogue should start from the JDP team, the dialogue made an important agenda at the level of each institution and everyone involved was expected to reach maximum support appropriate capacity owned.
One of the JDP's agenda is to facilitate public consultation in several places in Papua and West Papua. Very risky indeed if the public consultation carried out is seen as the only step approach and forms of consolidation. For participants in public consultation is very limited though attended by people who played an important role in their community but there are many other important figures who were not involved, the avoidance or forgotten, for they all would require a different strategy approach.
Also realized that the polarization among people of Papua lately increased very sharply so many parties that had to be approached and invited to speak. The approach taken to the former political prisoners, prisoners and people of Papua in foreign countries must be balanced with the approach to the characters and the prisoners are political prisoners still in jail in the country. As with the communication with the movements of young people in Papua should be strengthened. Other groups have also seriously involved with the press is to oversee issues of dialogue and expand coverage of the pro-dialogue continuously. Because if every time the reader is presented information about the pro-dialogue will inevitably everyone will meet and interact with a variety of ideas pro-dialogue.
The next group should also be considered a comer. ALDP survey with Cordaid - Netherlands in 2009 in 3 (three) locations of Jayapura, Jayapura and Kab Kab Keerom indicates that the response to understand the problems of migrants in Papua has increased in line with their increasing role. Some people suggest that migrants papua engaged in resolving problems on the ground in accordance with the capacity papua and proportion. Father Neles Tebay in Dialogue Jakarta, Papua, Papua Perspective A also mentions the existence of migrants. Offer of dialogue for immigrants is still a fear. Dialogue seemed tantamount to an independent Papua, now the dialogue became sensitive issue for immigrants. So that communication is important to build a more intensive and open to newcomers about the humanitarian issues that occurred in Papua and the importance of dialogue to find solutions together.
The main principle when doing pro campaign dialogue is to provide opportunities for - great for anyone to develop initiatives, contribute to each other and bersinergis. Each process must be communicated to the public especially to make them feel involved in every process even invited to make a decision. Must be diligent to confirm and provide information. Perhaps the time will be longer but the support provided will be more powerful and real. All people should remain optimistic that promote critical and rational attitude. Many people have started to work and still need a lot more people because there are a lot of work. There are working diligently and openly, but some are done with perseverance and silently. May be preceded by a lot of insults rather than compliments therefore needed is consistency.
Read More..
Now the issue of dialogue revolving so fast that sometimes some things of substance and some of the terms have not been agreed upon, refined, standardized and well understood in conjunction with already developed with a variety of perceptions. Technically this is still a lot of things that must be considered in order not to affect the substance and purpose of dialogue.
Dialogue Papua Jakarta have multiple interpretations. People arguing for the word of Papua or Jakarta first, there is the opinion of Papua said first mentioned to indicate where they are. When called dialogue Papua Jakarta there is a direct mean to the national dialogue, to participate call the press and the national dialogue as a developing news. Words as Papua and Jakarta were actually shown in 2 subjects and political territories in conflict: Papua and Jakarta. Jakarta as a center of power from the Indonesian government is continuously assessed heart failure in making and integrating Papua into Indonesia also ignores the existence of the Papuans even psychologically Jakarta is the personification of the oppressor group. While Papua entity represents the area and always had the practice of injustice, state violence, oppression, and sacrificed for the interests of Indonesia.
So that when called Dialogue Papua Jakarta indirectly defines the type of dialogue as a national dialogue. The demand for third party involvement and / or international parties or committed abroad, and given the title of an international dialogue that dialogue remains Papua and Jakarta. So the involvement of third-party claims and or international parties framed in an effort to inspire trust, neutrality and objectivity. Help create the conditions and situations that facilitate the process of dialogue rather than backing one party.
Bids dialogue also will be faced with a referendum issue by some groups of pro-independence papua. This is because there is still uncertainty about the dialogue and the perception of the referendum. Dialogue should be understood as a way to communicate problems, formulate and make choices. While the referendum or too NKRI, OTSUS etc. It is the result or the option of dialogue. So of course to put the dialog box is not equal to the box to put the referendum, the Republic of Indonesia, OTSUS or other options. Dialogue is a way or a way to arrive at the following boxes are. Referendum issue will also be exploited by groups that are pro-Republic of Indonesia to maintain the conflict among the papua.
Group wishes to support the dialogue must remain enriched by the realities and possibilities - possibilities that will be encountered. Because there is his hope that the dialogue is the last option to negotiate with Indonesia so worried if then the dialog will fail (again). There is also a very quick thinking and have more technical determine the location of the dialog or negotiator or a third party that argues that dialogue must be done quickly. There was a very agree but do not understand how to start and contribute to the dialogue that leave the task to the team formed by LIPI and Father Neles Tebay. Of course among the various expectations that have been there, there is also suspicion, rejection and even the campaign against the dialogue that continues to grow, so must be managed properly in order to support a growing dialogue. Campaigns pro dialogue should be done with a synergy through various opportunities available and made on purpose.
LIPI and Father Neles Tebay has initiated the meeting in Singapore last November 2009 with the involvement of NGO activists, youth, students, indigenous leaders and the next group of scholars formed papua Peace Network (JDP). JDP main agenda is to disseminate the concept of dialogue and gather input from the community of the dialogue bid. Efforts to internalize the support of the dialogue should start from the JDP team, the dialogue made an important agenda at the level of each institution and everyone involved was expected to reach maximum support appropriate capacity owned.
One of the JDP's agenda is to facilitate public consultation in several places in Papua and West Papua. Very risky indeed if the public consultation carried out is seen as the only step approach and forms of consolidation. For participants in public consultation is very limited though attended by people who played an important role in their community but there are many other important figures who were not involved, the avoidance or forgotten, for they all would require a different strategy approach.
Also realized that the polarization among people of Papua lately increased very sharply so many parties that had to be approached and invited to speak. The approach taken to the former political prisoners, prisoners and people of Papua in foreign countries must be balanced with the approach to the characters and the prisoners are political prisoners still in jail in the country. As with the communication with the movements of young people in Papua should be strengthened. Other groups have also seriously involved with the press is to oversee issues of dialogue and expand coverage of the pro-dialogue continuously. Because if every time the reader is presented information about the pro-dialogue will inevitably everyone will meet and interact with a variety of ideas pro-dialogue.
The next group should also be considered a comer. ALDP survey with Cordaid - Netherlands in 2009 in 3 (three) locations of Jayapura, Jayapura and Kab Kab Keerom indicates that the response to understand the problems of migrants in Papua has increased in line with their increasing role. Some people suggest that migrants papua engaged in resolving problems on the ground in accordance with the capacity papua and proportion. Father Neles Tebay in Dialogue Jakarta, Papua, Papua Perspective A also mentions the existence of migrants. Offer of dialogue for immigrants is still a fear. Dialogue seemed tantamount to an independent Papua, now the dialogue became sensitive issue for immigrants. So that communication is important to build a more intensive and open to newcomers about the humanitarian issues that occurred in Papua and the importance of dialogue to find solutions together.
The main principle when doing pro campaign dialogue is to provide opportunities for - great for anyone to develop initiatives, contribute to each other and bersinergis. Each process must be communicated to the public especially to make them feel involved in every process even invited to make a decision. Must be diligent to confirm and provide information. Perhaps the time will be longer but the support provided will be more powerful and real. All people should remain optimistic that promote critical and rational attitude. Many people have started to work and still need a lot more people because there are a lot of work. There are working diligently and openly, but some are done with perseverance and silently. May be preceded by a lot of insults rather than compliments therefore needed is consistency.
Read More..
Minggu, 14 Maret 2010
The Prospects for Papuan-Indonesian Dialogue
Clifton
In many cases, conflict in the workplace just seems to be a fact of life. We've all seen situations where different people with different goals and needs have come into conflict. effective conflict resolution skills can make the difference between positive and negative outcomes.
The Sixth Indonesia President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who was elected in October 2004, has indicated that he is committed to implementing the special autonomy law for West Papua. The 2001 special autonomy law for West Papua was enacted in a move to assuage Papua’s desire for independence. We realize that the special autonomy law implementation still lack of Perfect because the core of problems in Papua are how to make trust building between Jakarta and Papua. If we discussed about Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present and Securing the Future. Editor: Muridan S Widjojo, Jakarta 2009. Published by LIPI, Yayasan TIFA and Yayasan Obor, stakeholders in Jakarta and Papua seems not agree if should involved international. Moreover, Indonesia has many experience in solving problems in Ace, Timor Leste, and Ambon, Special for Papua, The Indonesia Government seems not agree if invite international group as mediator in Jakarta-Papua dialogue.
As part of a move by Jakarta to reduce the powers of the central administration in the wake of Suharto’s downfall, a law to devolve certain powers to district administrations throughout the country was enacted. In recognition of the many problems that had dogged Aceh’s relations with Jakarta, a special autonomy law for Aceh was adopted in 2001, Law 18/2001. In the same year, West Papua was also granted special autonomy under Law 21/2001. In both cases, these special autonomy laws met with widespread dissatisfaction. According to the Papua Road Map, both laws lacked legitimacy in the eyes of their people because they had been drafted without the involvement of local political and social organisations and parties. It was not until Jakarta entered into talks in Helsinki with the Aceh independence movement, facilitated by the former president of Finland, that an agreement was reached between the two sides, resulting in a law on the Governance of Aceh. Shortly prior to the agreement, Aceh was devastated by a tsunami in December 2004 that left some 140,000 people dead, which increased the pressure on all sides to end the conflict.
The 2001 special autonomy law for West Papua was enacted in a move to assuage Papua’s desire for independence. It was regarded with deep suspicion by Indonesian nationalists and the armed forces. Having already been stung by the loss of East Timor, they regarded special autonomy (OTSUS) as an unwarranted gift to Papuan separatists. But neither were West Papuan nationalists satisfied with OTSUS, in particular for failing to confront their demand for independence.
Papua Road Map is the product of several years of research undertaken in West Papua by academics at LIPI, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences. According to the Papua Road Map, this was a missed opportunity. Because of the failure of the Indonesian side to recognize the traditional Papuan approach to negotiations and its failure to consider the possibility of reaching a compromise, the breakdown in the talks resulted in the conflict continuing up to the present day, as well as a deepening mistrust between the two sides. Talks must be regarded as involving a long process. The Indonesian side needs to recognize that there are serious problems in Papua.
As a prelude to its evaluation of the prospects for dialogue, the Papua Road Map gives an account of the impact of development in West Papua. Far from benefitting the local people, this has resulted in their marginalization and discrimination.
The education system is very unsatisfactory and has failed to produce Papuans with a decent level of education. Although plenty of schools have been built, there is a serious lack of teachers and school books. The LIPI team concluded that education is worse today than in the 1970s, largely because the private schools which were run by the churches have been closed down, giving way to _”_presidential instruction” (OTSUS) schools of indifferent quality. They point out that teachers produced under the earlier system were more dedicated to their vocation than those produced today. Certainly, a great level of dedication is required for teachers to live in remote villagers where they lack the facilities to which they are accustomed. (Most if not all the teachers are recruited from outside Papua.) The fees for local primary schools are far too high for many Papuans and the schools are too far away for the children to go to school every day, with little in the way of transportation.
According to a survey undertaken in 2006, 73,729 of the 432,122 children aged 7-15 years, of whom most were concentrated in the Central Highlands, had never been to school. While the statistics would suggest that the number of teachers is adequate, they rarely teach at schools in the interior as most of them prefer to live in urban areas. Many head teachers simply don’t bother to visit their school unless exams are taking place. A teacher at a secondary school in Merauke is quoted as saying that she couldn’t teach children who had already graduated from primary school because they couldn’t read, write, or count. In Yahukimo district, according to the 2006 survery, were more than 47 students per teacher.
Moreover, the allocation of OTSUS funds for education was far below that required by law. Education should have received 30 percent of the budget but its allocation in the provincial budget for 2008 was less than five percent.
As for economic empowerment, Papuans do not have the necessary business skills to compete with people who have migrated to the territory from other parts of Indonesia. Whereas in 1959, outsiders accounted for a mere 2 percent of the population, demographic experts expect it to increase to 53.5 percent by 2011. Although 48% of the villages in Papua province, and 37% of those in West Papua province, are below the poverty line, the territory is extremely rich in natural resources. A foreign multinational, Freeport-McMoran, is mining Papua’s copper and gold and is the largest taxpayer in the country. BP has also just begun to exploit Papua’s natural gas.
In order to address peacefully the injustice in West Papua Jakarta and Papua must do :
Seeking just and peaceful solution through an all-inclusive dialogue. All stakeholders representing Center and local government and the Papuans should participate in this dialogue. Such a dialogue would be a peaceful means for the Indonesia authorities and the Papuans to reach a common understanding on the problems that have to be addressedand a common agreement on the role of stakeholders.
The Indonesia government should encourage to implement without any delay and carry out supervisory institution to supervise implementation law number 21/2001 on Special Autonomy for West Papua for it addresses the neglect and marginalization of the socio-economic in Papua.
Dialogue should proceed through four stages: a national dialogue between the central government and Papuan representatives, dialogue between the Papuan representatives, dialogue within the Papuan elite who will be in charge of the political processes, and then dialogue between the Indonesian government Papuan representatives not involve international side in solution the Papua problems because Papua is part of NKRI. To incarnate trust and capacity building local government, all stakeholders in Jakarta and papua should Promote the capacity and opportunity of civil society organizations, to advocate for justice and ensure respect human rights in Papua.
Source : PapuaToday.com March 13, 2010
Read More..
In many cases, conflict in the workplace just seems to be a fact of life. We've all seen situations where different people with different goals and needs have come into conflict. effective conflict resolution skills can make the difference between positive and negative outcomes.
The Sixth Indonesia President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who was elected in October 2004, has indicated that he is committed to implementing the special autonomy law for West Papua. The 2001 special autonomy law for West Papua was enacted in a move to assuage Papua’s desire for independence. We realize that the special autonomy law implementation still lack of Perfect because the core of problems in Papua are how to make trust building between Jakarta and Papua. If we discussed about Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present and Securing the Future. Editor: Muridan S Widjojo, Jakarta 2009. Published by LIPI, Yayasan TIFA and Yayasan Obor, stakeholders in Jakarta and Papua seems not agree if should involved international. Moreover, Indonesia has many experience in solving problems in Ace, Timor Leste, and Ambon, Special for Papua, The Indonesia Government seems not agree if invite international group as mediator in Jakarta-Papua dialogue.
As part of a move by Jakarta to reduce the powers of the central administration in the wake of Suharto’s downfall, a law to devolve certain powers to district administrations throughout the country was enacted. In recognition of the many problems that had dogged Aceh’s relations with Jakarta, a special autonomy law for Aceh was adopted in 2001, Law 18/2001. In the same year, West Papua was also granted special autonomy under Law 21/2001. In both cases, these special autonomy laws met with widespread dissatisfaction. According to the Papua Road Map, both laws lacked legitimacy in the eyes of their people because they had been drafted without the involvement of local political and social organisations and parties. It was not until Jakarta entered into talks in Helsinki with the Aceh independence movement, facilitated by the former president of Finland, that an agreement was reached between the two sides, resulting in a law on the Governance of Aceh. Shortly prior to the agreement, Aceh was devastated by a tsunami in December 2004 that left some 140,000 people dead, which increased the pressure on all sides to end the conflict.
The 2001 special autonomy law for West Papua was enacted in a move to assuage Papua’s desire for independence. It was regarded with deep suspicion by Indonesian nationalists and the armed forces. Having already been stung by the loss of East Timor, they regarded special autonomy (OTSUS) as an unwarranted gift to Papuan separatists. But neither were West Papuan nationalists satisfied with OTSUS, in particular for failing to confront their demand for independence.
Papua Road Map is the product of several years of research undertaken in West Papua by academics at LIPI, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences. According to the Papua Road Map, this was a missed opportunity. Because of the failure of the Indonesian side to recognize the traditional Papuan approach to negotiations and its failure to consider the possibility of reaching a compromise, the breakdown in the talks resulted in the conflict continuing up to the present day, as well as a deepening mistrust between the two sides. Talks must be regarded as involving a long process. The Indonesian side needs to recognize that there are serious problems in Papua.
As a prelude to its evaluation of the prospects for dialogue, the Papua Road Map gives an account of the impact of development in West Papua. Far from benefitting the local people, this has resulted in their marginalization and discrimination.
The education system is very unsatisfactory and has failed to produce Papuans with a decent level of education. Although plenty of schools have been built, there is a serious lack of teachers and school books. The LIPI team concluded that education is worse today than in the 1970s, largely because the private schools which were run by the churches have been closed down, giving way to _”_presidential instruction” (OTSUS) schools of indifferent quality. They point out that teachers produced under the earlier system were more dedicated to their vocation than those produced today. Certainly, a great level of dedication is required for teachers to live in remote villagers where they lack the facilities to which they are accustomed. (Most if not all the teachers are recruited from outside Papua.) The fees for local primary schools are far too high for many Papuans and the schools are too far away for the children to go to school every day, with little in the way of transportation.
According to a survey undertaken in 2006, 73,729 of the 432,122 children aged 7-15 years, of whom most were concentrated in the Central Highlands, had never been to school. While the statistics would suggest that the number of teachers is adequate, they rarely teach at schools in the interior as most of them prefer to live in urban areas. Many head teachers simply don’t bother to visit their school unless exams are taking place. A teacher at a secondary school in Merauke is quoted as saying that she couldn’t teach children who had already graduated from primary school because they couldn’t read, write, or count. In Yahukimo district, according to the 2006 survery, were more than 47 students per teacher.
Moreover, the allocation of OTSUS funds for education was far below that required by law. Education should have received 30 percent of the budget but its allocation in the provincial budget for 2008 was less than five percent.
As for economic empowerment, Papuans do not have the necessary business skills to compete with people who have migrated to the territory from other parts of Indonesia. Whereas in 1959, outsiders accounted for a mere 2 percent of the population, demographic experts expect it to increase to 53.5 percent by 2011. Although 48% of the villages in Papua province, and 37% of those in West Papua province, are below the poverty line, the territory is extremely rich in natural resources. A foreign multinational, Freeport-McMoran, is mining Papua’s copper and gold and is the largest taxpayer in the country. BP has also just begun to exploit Papua’s natural gas.
In order to address peacefully the injustice in West Papua Jakarta and Papua must do :
Seeking just and peaceful solution through an all-inclusive dialogue. All stakeholders representing Center and local government and the Papuans should participate in this dialogue. Such a dialogue would be a peaceful means for the Indonesia authorities and the Papuans to reach a common understanding on the problems that have to be addressedand a common agreement on the role of stakeholders.
The Indonesia government should encourage to implement without any delay and carry out supervisory institution to supervise implementation law number 21/2001 on Special Autonomy for West Papua for it addresses the neglect and marginalization of the socio-economic in Papua.
Dialogue should proceed through four stages: a national dialogue between the central government and Papuan representatives, dialogue between the Papuan representatives, dialogue within the Papuan elite who will be in charge of the political processes, and then dialogue between the Indonesian government Papuan representatives not involve international side in solution the Papua problems because Papua is part of NKRI. To incarnate trust and capacity building local government, all stakeholders in Jakarta and papua should Promote the capacity and opportunity of civil society organizations, to advocate for justice and ensure respect human rights in Papua.
Source : PapuaToday.com March 13, 2010
Read More..
RI, PNG open border post at Sokau-Wutung
Indonesian and Papua New Guinean (PNG) governments have agreed on Friday to open an official border post at Sokau-Wutung between the two countries.
The agreement to open the border post was jointly signed by visiting Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and PNG Prime Minister Michael Somare after a bilateral meeting in Port Moresby on Friday.
Besides the border post agreement, three other memorandum of understandings on the prevention of double tax, defense and security cooperation, and and agriculture cooperation between the two governments were also signed by related ministers of the two countries.
At a joint press conference after the bilateral meeting, President Yudhoyono explained that the two countries had agreed to continue with the border management, in addition to police and military cooperation.
The president at a meeting with Indonesian community in PNG also said border issues between the two countries would continue to be improved to step up economic and social relations among the people living at the two countries border areas.
The agreement on the border issues, according to the president, should be based on demarcation regulation.
In economic field, President Yudhoyono said the two countries had agreed to step up cooperation in investment, trade, agriculture, transportation, micro credit and small medium enterprises.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Michael Somare expressed hope that there would be a cooperation in trade and manufacture production such as machinery and textile equipment.
"We also need cooperation in liquefied natural gas (LNG) process and small medium business," Somare said.
Regarding the agreement on the prevention of double tax, President Yudhoyono said it would be made to avoid imposition of tax on Indonesian businessmen in PNG and PNG businessmen in Indonesia.
"It will make investment and business expansion in the two countries more expensive and inefficient, and therefore the detail of the agreement will be discussed in the ministerial meeting of the two countries," Yudhoyono said.
In addition, the two countries also agreed to cooperate in international forum on climate change and forest management.
Source : ANTARA - Friday, March 12, 2010 Port Moresby
Read More..
The agreement to open the border post was jointly signed by visiting Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and PNG Prime Minister Michael Somare after a bilateral meeting in Port Moresby on Friday.
Besides the border post agreement, three other memorandum of understandings on the prevention of double tax, defense and security cooperation, and and agriculture cooperation between the two governments were also signed by related ministers of the two countries.
At a joint press conference after the bilateral meeting, President Yudhoyono explained that the two countries had agreed to continue with the border management, in addition to police and military cooperation.
The president at a meeting with Indonesian community in PNG also said border issues between the two countries would continue to be improved to step up economic and social relations among the people living at the two countries border areas.
The agreement on the border issues, according to the president, should be based on demarcation regulation.
In economic field, President Yudhoyono said the two countries had agreed to step up cooperation in investment, trade, agriculture, transportation, micro credit and small medium enterprises.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Michael Somare expressed hope that there would be a cooperation in trade and manufacture production such as machinery and textile equipment.
"We also need cooperation in liquefied natural gas (LNG) process and small medium business," Somare said.
Regarding the agreement on the prevention of double tax, President Yudhoyono said it would be made to avoid imposition of tax on Indonesian businessmen in PNG and PNG businessmen in Indonesia.
"It will make investment and business expansion in the two countries more expensive and inefficient, and therefore the detail of the agreement will be discussed in the ministerial meeting of the two countries," Yudhoyono said.
In addition, the two countries also agreed to cooperate in international forum on climate change and forest management.
Source : ANTARA - Friday, March 12, 2010 Port Moresby
Read More..
Senin, 22 Februari 2010
Forestry minister warned Freeport
Minister of Forestry Zulkifli Hasan miner rebuke from the United States, PT Freeport Indonesia, because it still operates even if not yet completed the process of using borrowed licenses. In addition to Freeport, Zulkifli said in a working meeting with the House Commission IV in Jakarta, Monday (22 / 2), eleven other companies that also operate in protected forests, also have not received similar permission.
Freeport and 12 other mining companies the privilege to perform open mining in protected forests based on Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) No.1/2004 Perppu known as Mines. He said, Kemhut already issued the first warning letter to Freeport. "We immediately sent a second warning letter," he said. Menhut requested that law enforcement officers to take action against violations of law occurred. "Law enforcement officers should not only take action against the small things. But it is also a great act," he said.
Meanwhile, Director General of Planning Kemhut, Soetrisno revealed, until now only two companies that have received permission to borrow wear, namely PT Indominco Mandiri and PT Aneka Tambang. "PT Inco is currently in process of asking permission to borrow using. But the governor has not received a recommendation," he said. Members of the House of Representatives, Mark Dance, supporting measures to bring order Menhut mining in forest areas. He challenged Menhut to take firm action to halt Freeport's operations. "Menhut must dare to take action. Stop the operation if necessary," he stated. Zulkifli said it could not conduct such legal action revoke the operating license for mining permits issued not by Kemhut. "What's his permission to publish other agencies," he said.
News on a proud nation who had been as afraid to take action against foreign mining corporations "Freeport" which has been operating for decades in Papua. However Menhut courage stated that if no courage diukung with law enforcement agencies and the government, just rhetoric. Yet the damage has been caused by gold mining company Freeport is very alarming. Read More..
Freeport and 12 other mining companies the privilege to perform open mining in protected forests based on Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) No.1/2004 Perppu known as Mines. He said, Kemhut already issued the first warning letter to Freeport. "We immediately sent a second warning letter," he said. Menhut requested that law enforcement officers to take action against violations of law occurred. "Law enforcement officers should not only take action against the small things. But it is also a great act," he said.
Meanwhile, Director General of Planning Kemhut, Soetrisno revealed, until now only two companies that have received permission to borrow wear, namely PT Indominco Mandiri and PT Aneka Tambang. "PT Inco is currently in process of asking permission to borrow using. But the governor has not received a recommendation," he said. Members of the House of Representatives, Mark Dance, supporting measures to bring order Menhut mining in forest areas. He challenged Menhut to take firm action to halt Freeport's operations. "Menhut must dare to take action. Stop the operation if necessary," he stated. Zulkifli said it could not conduct such legal action revoke the operating license for mining permits issued not by Kemhut. "What's his permission to publish other agencies," he said.
News on a proud nation who had been as afraid to take action against foreign mining corporations "Freeport" which has been operating for decades in Papua. However Menhut courage stated that if no courage diukung with law enforcement agencies and the government, just rhetoric. Yet the damage has been caused by gold mining company Freeport is very alarming. Read More..
Senin, 01 Februari 2010
Papuan activist in Netherlands Victor Kaisiepo dies aged 61
A Papuan activist, Victor Kaisiepo, has died in the Netherlands at the age of 61.
He was a spokesperson for the West Papua People’s Front, the Federation of Papuan organisations in the Netherlands.
Mr Kaisiepo also lobbied the United Nations to promote the rights of his people as well as the rights of other indigenous peoples.
He was born in Dutch New Guinea, but his family left for the Netherlands when the territory was handed over to Indonesia in 1962.
Mr Kaisiepo’s father was also a well-known activist for Papuan independence.
Read More..
He was a spokesperson for the West Papua People’s Front, the Federation of Papuan organisations in the Netherlands.
Mr Kaisiepo also lobbied the United Nations to promote the rights of his people as well as the rights of other indigenous peoples.
He was born in Dutch New Guinea, but his family left for the Netherlands when the territory was handed over to Indonesia in 1962.
Mr Kaisiepo’s father was also a well-known activist for Papuan independence.
Read More..
Lake Sentani plans festival to bridge gap
Ridwan Max Sijabat
Want to know how Papuan “female divers” smoke while diving, or how to call a crocodile out of a river by whistling, or any of the other unique local wisdom of the Sentani people?
Then don’t miss the Lake Sentani Festival, Jayapura Regent Habel Melkias Suwae says. Delivering his address at the opening of a Sentani photo exhibition here Friday, Habel said the festival, the third such festival since 2008, would be held from July 19 to 23, 2010r, and was targeting not only to attract more foreign and domestic tourists to the regency, but also to improve ties between Papua and Indonesia’s other provinces and peoples.
“Ethnically we are different. You are part of the Melayu ethnicity, but we are Melanesian. However,
we are one in Indonesia. This festival is really a means to introduce Papuan people and our culture to you. We need to get to know each other better to strengthen our big national family and to build
mutual trust,” said Habel, wearing a Batik shirt.
The exhibition displayed hundreds of shots taken by freelance photographer Toni Sri, depicting the cultures and daily lives of 24 Papuan ethnic groups living around the lake. The exhibition was aimed to attract all province in Indonesia to visit Papua during the upcoming festival. “Two eyes are not enough to see and shoot the richness of Papuan culture and its beautiful panorama.”
Freelance writer Anto Dwiastoro also launched Doors to the Unknown: The story of Sentani in the Papuan regency of Jayapura, a book with photos, covering Papuan culture, environment and historical sites around Lake Sentani. While the Lake Sentani Festival had cost Habel a lot to organize, he said he was proud of it and many other Papuan festivals. The funding was peanuts in comparison to the cultural value and “political benefit” it had for the whole nation, he said.
In 2008, the first festival attracted only around 2,000 foreign and domestic tourists, but the second brought in around 5,000. With the third we hope to see up to 10,000, because of the numerous pre-festival events both at home and overseas.
Habel, a former elementary school teacher and local Golkar Party chairman, said that unlike other festivals, the Lake Sentani Festival would present guests with dance performances, local customs and antiques, as well as sightseeing tours to historical sites and a tourist village near the lake.
“We have prepared 1,500 dancers from 24 villages around the lake... while villagers have been prepared to accommodate guests in their own homes to show our sincere hospitality,” he said.
Festival promotions manager Mian Simanjuntak said his team was working to promote the festival through hotel associations and airlines, both at home and abroad, at cultural events in Australia, Japan, South Korea, Europe and the US.
Source : The Jakarta Post
Read More..
Want to know how Papuan “female divers” smoke while diving, or how to call a crocodile out of a river by whistling, or any of the other unique local wisdom of the Sentani people?
Then don’t miss the Lake Sentani Festival, Jayapura Regent Habel Melkias Suwae says. Delivering his address at the opening of a Sentani photo exhibition here Friday, Habel said the festival, the third such festival since 2008, would be held from July 19 to 23, 2010r, and was targeting not only to attract more foreign and domestic tourists to the regency, but also to improve ties between Papua and Indonesia’s other provinces and peoples.
“Ethnically we are different. You are part of the Melayu ethnicity, but we are Melanesian. However,
we are one in Indonesia. This festival is really a means to introduce Papuan people and our culture to you. We need to get to know each other better to strengthen our big national family and to build
mutual trust,” said Habel, wearing a Batik shirt.
The exhibition displayed hundreds of shots taken by freelance photographer Toni Sri, depicting the cultures and daily lives of 24 Papuan ethnic groups living around the lake. The exhibition was aimed to attract all province in Indonesia to visit Papua during the upcoming festival. “Two eyes are not enough to see and shoot the richness of Papuan culture and its beautiful panorama.”
Freelance writer Anto Dwiastoro also launched Doors to the Unknown: The story of Sentani in the Papuan regency of Jayapura, a book with photos, covering Papuan culture, environment and historical sites around Lake Sentani. While the Lake Sentani Festival had cost Habel a lot to organize, he said he was proud of it and many other Papuan festivals. The funding was peanuts in comparison to the cultural value and “political benefit” it had for the whole nation, he said.
In 2008, the first festival attracted only around 2,000 foreign and domestic tourists, but the second brought in around 5,000. With the third we hope to see up to 10,000, because of the numerous pre-festival events both at home and overseas.
Habel, a former elementary school teacher and local Golkar Party chairman, said that unlike other festivals, the Lake Sentani Festival would present guests with dance performances, local customs and antiques, as well as sightseeing tours to historical sites and a tourist village near the lake.
“We have prepared 1,500 dancers from 24 villages around the lake... while villagers have been prepared to accommodate guests in their own homes to show our sincere hospitality,” he said.
Festival promotions manager Mian Simanjuntak said his team was working to promote the festival through hotel associations and airlines, both at home and abroad, at cultural events in Australia, Japan, South Korea, Europe and the US.
Source : The Jakarta Post
Read More..
Selasa, 19 Januari 2010
England Action FWPC not to be taken
Peaceful demonstrations are often held by some people who call themselves the "Free West Papua Campaign (FWPC)" is in front of the Embassy of London led Benny Wenda seraca not to be taken politically, because it was just the way they make money by attracting the attention of tourists. This was said by one of his former political combatants Free Papua Movement (OPM) which has officially returned to the bosom of the motherland Indonesia, Nicholas messed.
"Action demonstration in front of the Embassy London starring Benny Wenda who wore traditional dress of Papua's indigenous people is an art attraction, so as not to be taken politically, but viewed from the side of the art of traditional dress. Pendemonya shouting If Papuan independence then it is not needs ignored, "he said.
Benny Wenda should not need to seek a political sensation abroad, but just go back to Papua, his homeland and with his brothers to build Papua New Papua is more just, peaceful and prosperous.
Benny Wenda should be aware she is currently being used by certain NGOs to the NGO's own interests that the ends are pulled sympathetic to bring more money for the success of the political agenda of these NGOs. FWPC in action never received support from the British government, for their own FWPC not recognized as an official organization in the UK. So what FWPC campaigning for Papuan independence, if the UK supports the integrity of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia and Papua part of Indonesia.
'It should be noted, the British Government has formally and consistently recognized Papua as an integral part of the Republic of Indonesia, "he said. According messed, what is done Benny Wenda with his colleagues was just a waste of time and energy. Far better he returned to Papua to build this land of Papua.
"I've had decades of experience in foreign countries struggling for independence of Papua, but the struggle was futile, even torment yourself and harming others in the land of the people of Papua," he said. "Whether or not good, my land Papua better. Rain in the land of gold, stones rain in their own country, right in their own country," he said poetically.
Read More..
"Action demonstration in front of the Embassy London starring Benny Wenda who wore traditional dress of Papua's indigenous people is an art attraction, so as not to be taken politically, but viewed from the side of the art of traditional dress. Pendemonya shouting If Papuan independence then it is not needs ignored, "he said.
Benny Wenda should not need to seek a political sensation abroad, but just go back to Papua, his homeland and with his brothers to build Papua New Papua is more just, peaceful and prosperous.
Benny Wenda should be aware she is currently being used by certain NGOs to the NGO's own interests that the ends are pulled sympathetic to bring more money for the success of the political agenda of these NGOs. FWPC in action never received support from the British government, for their own FWPC not recognized as an official organization in the UK. So what FWPC campaigning for Papuan independence, if the UK supports the integrity of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia and Papua part of Indonesia.
'It should be noted, the British Government has formally and consistently recognized Papua as an integral part of the Republic of Indonesia, "he said. According messed, what is done Benny Wenda with his colleagues was just a waste of time and energy. Far better he returned to Papua to build this land of Papua.
"I've had decades of experience in foreign countries struggling for independence of Papua, but the struggle was futile, even torment yourself and harming others in the land of the people of Papua," he said. "Whether or not good, my land Papua better. Rain in the land of gold, stones rain in their own country, right in their own country," he said poetically.
Read More..
Rabu, 13 Januari 2010
Free Papua Organization (OPM) group founder back in Indonesia
Free Papua Organization (OPM) rebel group founder Nicholas Jouwe arrived in Jakarta on Tuesday and vowed to spend the rest of his life in the country. Jouwe, 86, proceeded to the office of the Coordinating Public Welfare Minister Agung Laksono upon his arrival in Jakarta. Transportation Minister Freddy Numberi, who is a native Papuan, was also seen at the meeting.
“I left the Netherlands to settle on my home soil of Indonesia for good,” Jouwe was quoted by Antara.He said he was happy with the Indonesian government’s reception of him and its commitment to solving Papua’s problems.
In press conference Nicolas Jouwe said that I think Papua is part of Indonesia. We talked about the cooperation program, which is what we need. We have to develop the Papua land,” .
When asked about a series of attacks which are linked to OPM in Papua, Jouwe said the perpetrators were just “young people who know nothing.” “They emulated what other people in other parts of Indonesia did,” he added.
Source : Papua Today
Read More..
“I left the Netherlands to settle on my home soil of Indonesia for good,” Jouwe was quoted by Antara.He said he was happy with the Indonesian government’s reception of him and its commitment to solving Papua’s problems.
In press conference Nicolas Jouwe said that I think Papua is part of Indonesia. We talked about the cooperation program, which is what we need. We have to develop the Papua land,” .
When asked about a series of attacks which are linked to OPM in Papua, Jouwe said the perpetrators were just “young people who know nothing.” “They emulated what other people in other parts of Indonesia did,” he added.
Source : Papua Today
Read More..
Keerom district should be RI`s showcase on PNG border
Keerom district bordering Papua New Guinea (PNG) should be treated as the country`s "front yard" and therefore it should have adequate public facilities and a community welfare improved through empowerment programs, a regional official said.
The efforts needed to be made to make a positive impression with neighboring countries, said Keerom District Chief Celcius Watae here Tuesday.
He said the border region had strategic potentials but was also prone to security , political, socio-economic and cultural problems. Therefore, it should receive more attention, in order to create harmony with the neighboring country and prevent its community from becoming poorer than people on the other side of the border.
However, in reality development in the border area was making very slow progress as if it was the country`s "backyard," he said. . This way of things should be changed and the border region should be regarded as the country`s front porch in which outsiders could see the face of the nation, he said.
He said conditions in Keerom district on the border with PNG had unique characteristics because its people still had ties of kinship, culture and indigenous ownership of traditional lands with people on the other side of the border. Many people in Keerom still had relatives living just across he border with PNG with whom they shared customary ownership of land.
Conversely, many PNG citizens had relatives living on Indonesian territory and even owned land in the Republic of Indonesia.
"Resident who lives here (Indonesia) and there (PNG) experienced life as one big village that makes them need each other over the yearsm," he said and pointed out that the Walsa and Fermagem tribes were each actually part of the same extended family but lived in both Indonesia and PNG.
Both these tribes, he said, had members scattered in 14 villages living on PNG territory and in six villages on Indonesian territory , namely Kampung Ampas, Kalifam, Banda,: Pund, Kalimo and Yuwainde. Until July 2009, as many as 464 people from PNG were still living in and had settled down in the villages of Kampung Yabanda, Sengi sub-district, Keerom district.
Despite the efforts of the government to make the local people aware of their Indonesian citizenship the mobility of people between villages along the border was difficult to stop, especially in Keerom where a market selling a variety of basic needs was also attracting buyers from across the border.
To anticipate developments in the neighboring country, the Indonesian government which had the authority to handle the border areas to build public facilities such as roads, bridges, educational facilities, health services and schools.
Regarding the security situation on the border with PNG, Cenderahwasih XVII regional commander Maj. Gen. AY Nasution said security conditions there were expected to improve in 2010.
Moreover, the Free Papua Organization (OPM)figure Nicolaas Jouwe who had settled abroad, returned to Papua and chose to be an Indonesian citizens. Nicolaas, reportedly arrived in Jakarta on Monday (Jan 111) and will soon head to Jayapura.
Source : ANTARA News
Read More..
The efforts needed to be made to make a positive impression with neighboring countries, said Keerom District Chief Celcius Watae here Tuesday.
He said the border region had strategic potentials but was also prone to security , political, socio-economic and cultural problems. Therefore, it should receive more attention, in order to create harmony with the neighboring country and prevent its community from becoming poorer than people on the other side of the border.
However, in reality development in the border area was making very slow progress as if it was the country`s "backyard," he said. . This way of things should be changed and the border region should be regarded as the country`s front porch in which outsiders could see the face of the nation, he said.
He said conditions in Keerom district on the border with PNG had unique characteristics because its people still had ties of kinship, culture and indigenous ownership of traditional lands with people on the other side of the border. Many people in Keerom still had relatives living just across he border with PNG with whom they shared customary ownership of land.
Conversely, many PNG citizens had relatives living on Indonesian territory and even owned land in the Republic of Indonesia.
"Resident who lives here (Indonesia) and there (PNG) experienced life as one big village that makes them need each other over the yearsm," he said and pointed out that the Walsa and Fermagem tribes were each actually part of the same extended family but lived in both Indonesia and PNG.
Both these tribes, he said, had members scattered in 14 villages living on PNG territory and in six villages on Indonesian territory , namely Kampung Ampas, Kalifam, Banda,: Pund, Kalimo and Yuwainde. Until July 2009, as many as 464 people from PNG were still living in and had settled down in the villages of Kampung Yabanda, Sengi sub-district, Keerom district.
Despite the efforts of the government to make the local people aware of their Indonesian citizenship the mobility of people between villages along the border was difficult to stop, especially in Keerom where a market selling a variety of basic needs was also attracting buyers from across the border.
To anticipate developments in the neighboring country, the Indonesian government which had the authority to handle the border areas to build public facilities such as roads, bridges, educational facilities, health services and schools.
Regarding the security situation on the border with PNG, Cenderahwasih XVII regional commander Maj. Gen. AY Nasution said security conditions there were expected to improve in 2010.
Moreover, the Free Papua Organization (OPM)figure Nicolaas Jouwe who had settled abroad, returned to Papua and chose to be an Indonesian citizens. Nicolaas, reportedly arrived in Jakarta on Monday (Jan 111) and will soon head to Jayapura.
Source : ANTARA News
Read More..
Mimika students, councilors call for end to tribal clashes
Markus Makur
Fifth-grader Eikman Songgonao from the SD Inpres state elementary school in Kwamki Lama in Mimika, Papua, has not been to school since tribal clashes erupted last week.“My friends and I want to go back to school, but we’re terrified of the fighting still taking place in Kwamki Lama,” Songgonao told The Jakarta Post on Monday.
He appealed to the upper and lower Kwamki Lama tribes involved in the conflict to immediately cease hostilities so the students could return to school. The feud is blamed on the failure of one of the tribes to pay compensation for a rape allegedly committed by a member of the rival tribe six months ago.“Students from both warring tribes have missed out on school, and some have even joined their parents in the fighting,” Songgonao said during a visit by Mimika and Papua legislators.
“I’ve asked my parents to stop their involvement in the conflict.”
The school has been closed for the past week, following the tribal clashes that often play out right in front of the schoolyard.
Songgonao said teachers were no longer willing to come to Kwamki Lama due to the conflict.
“I don’t know when this war will end. I’m very sad about the situation in Kwamki Lama,” he said.
“The warring groups, those who still have family ties, must immediately stop the conflict.”
Songgonao added he had earlier taken part in the fighting, while his friends were still engaged in it.
Mimika Police chief Adj. Sr. Comr. Moh. Sagi said police had tried to mediate in the dispute.
Police have cordoned off the main battleground and posted personnel in the area. Both warring groups, previously armed with bows and arrows, have since laid down their arms, and for the most part the attacks had ceased over the weekend.
“Councilors from the Mimika and Papua legislatures are here today to meet both communities in an effort to stop the conflict,” Sagi said.
“I hope the groups are able to end the hostilities and seek a peaceful way to reach a peace agreement.”
Mimika councilor Elminus Mom, from the Great Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra), said the regency legislature had been trying to forge a peaceful resolution for the past week.
“As a native of Kwamki Lama and a tribal member sitting in the legislature, I urge the groups to end the fighting today,” he said.
“The Mimika and Papua councilors will only be here today and are waiting for the two to make peace.”
Mimika councilor Pieter Magal, from the Democratic Party, echoed the call.
“I’m present and standing here now to urge the people to stop the fighting,” he said, adding he himself was from the local Amungme tribe.
Upper Kwamki Lama battle leader Yulianus Agabal said he was open to the reconciliation efforts by the regency and provincial councilors.
“We accept every effort made by the Mimika and Papua legislators to end the conflict,” he said.
“As the victims, we will meet with the lower Kwamki Lama group to discuss ending the conflict immediately.”
Source : The Jakarta Post
Read More..
Fifth-grader Eikman Songgonao from the SD Inpres state elementary school in Kwamki Lama in Mimika, Papua, has not been to school since tribal clashes erupted last week.“My friends and I want to go back to school, but we’re terrified of the fighting still taking place in Kwamki Lama,” Songgonao told The Jakarta Post on Monday.
He appealed to the upper and lower Kwamki Lama tribes involved in the conflict to immediately cease hostilities so the students could return to school. The feud is blamed on the failure of one of the tribes to pay compensation for a rape allegedly committed by a member of the rival tribe six months ago.“Students from both warring tribes have missed out on school, and some have even joined their parents in the fighting,” Songgonao said during a visit by Mimika and Papua legislators.
“I’ve asked my parents to stop their involvement in the conflict.”
The school has been closed for the past week, following the tribal clashes that often play out right in front of the schoolyard.
Songgonao said teachers were no longer willing to come to Kwamki Lama due to the conflict.
“I don’t know when this war will end. I’m very sad about the situation in Kwamki Lama,” he said.
“The warring groups, those who still have family ties, must immediately stop the conflict.”
Songgonao added he had earlier taken part in the fighting, while his friends were still engaged in it.
Mimika Police chief Adj. Sr. Comr. Moh. Sagi said police had tried to mediate in the dispute.
Police have cordoned off the main battleground and posted personnel in the area. Both warring groups, previously armed with bows and arrows, have since laid down their arms, and for the most part the attacks had ceased over the weekend.
“Councilors from the Mimika and Papua legislatures are here today to meet both communities in an effort to stop the conflict,” Sagi said.
“I hope the groups are able to end the hostilities and seek a peaceful way to reach a peace agreement.”
Mimika councilor Elminus Mom, from the Great Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra), said the regency legislature had been trying to forge a peaceful resolution for the past week.
“As a native of Kwamki Lama and a tribal member sitting in the legislature, I urge the groups to end the fighting today,” he said.
“The Mimika and Papua councilors will only be here today and are waiting for the two to make peace.”
Mimika councilor Pieter Magal, from the Democratic Party, echoed the call.
“I’m present and standing here now to urge the people to stop the fighting,” he said, adding he himself was from the local Amungme tribe.
Upper Kwamki Lama battle leader Yulianus Agabal said he was open to the reconciliation efforts by the regency and provincial councilors.
“We accept every effort made by the Mimika and Papua legislators to end the conflict,” he said.
“As the victims, we will meet with the lower Kwamki Lama group to discuss ending the conflict immediately.”
Source : The Jakarta Post
Read More..
Minggu, 10 Januari 2010
Central Government Budget Assistance to Papua TA.2010 USD $ 21.89 Trillion
JAYAPURA/PT- On January 8, 2010 Papua receive Form Implementation of the central government budget which has increased from the previous year 2009 only Rp 19.058 trillion, then in 2010 was the Papua received Rp 21.89 trillion or an increase of about USD 2.8 trillion from the central government. In his speech the Governor of Papua Barnabas Suebu, SH said, the total fund of Rp 21.89 trillion from the State Revenues and Expenditures (Budget), among others sourced from a managed budget agencies of central government, the General Allocation Fund (DAU), the Special Allocation Fund (DAK), the Special Autonomy Fund (Autonomy) and Infrastruktut Autonomy Fund.
Delivery of DIPA has a symbolic meaning that is very important, namely that President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono wants the continuity of development which took place without a break, without stopping, in Papua Province. For that there is no reason to delay implementation of the budget in the form of development activities that have been planned in accordance with the stages according to the applicable government regulations, seriously guided by the principles of budget management is accountable, results-oriented, professional, proportionate , and open / transparent. In his speech President Yudhoyono asked the seriousness of all parties to not accumulate disbursements at year-end budget, but disseminate it more proportional to each quarter. That means that the implementation of the budget must be started early in 2010 so that the role of government budget as a stimulus to the economy actually improved efektifivitasnya.
The entire state budget funds in 2010 amounted to USD 1047.6 Trillion consisting of, the central government budget of Rp 725.2 trillion, and transfers to regional budgets amounted to Rp 322.4 Trillion
Of total central government budget, allocated to them, spending Employees Rp 160.3 trillion, spending Rp 107.0 T goods, capital expenditure Rp 82.1 trillion, social assistance and Rp 64.2 trillion debt interest spending, subsidies and spending Other-Other amounted to Rp 30.7 trillion.
Then the total budget allocation of funds for Papua Province, managed by government agencies is central to Rp 5.78 trillion, with the details, shopping Employees Rp 1.60 trillion, spending Rp 1.29 trillion of goods, capital expenditure Rp 1.95 Trillion , and social assistance Trilyun.Lembaga USD $ 0.92 this year the government allocated a large enough budget is the national education department Rp 0.54 trillion, the department of defense Rp 0.61 trillion, the Ministry of Public Works USD 1.44 Trillion, National Police Rp 0.63 trillion, the Ministry of Health amounted to Rp 0.07 trillion, and the Department of Transportation is Rp 0.65 trillion.
National Education Fund Allocation of them will be used for Social Assistance Institute of Education, Office of Education, Youth and Sports of Papua province to Rp 360.5 billion. Allocation of Department of Public Works of which USD 1.3 Trillion, will be used for the construction of roads and bridges, residential infrastructure development, development of water management and environmental health as well as the settlement of natural resource management and other activities on the field of Public Works.
Allocation of funds National Police will be used mostly for police operations throughout the province of Papua. Department of Health Allocation of funds for other than operational expenditure will also be used for the construction of Jayapura Office of Health Polytechnic of Rp 17.5 billion.
As for the Papua province in the fiscal year 2010 funding was obtained allocations that make up the bulk of the Papua Provincial structure as follows: DAU Rp 11.119 trillion with the details of the Papua Province DAU USD 1.148 trillion and DAU County / City of Rp 9.971 trillion. Then Papua Province DAK Rp 1.5 trillion, with details of the Papua Province DAK Rp 75 billion and DAK County / City of Rp 1.453 trillion. Next fund Otsus Rp. 3.49 trillion, which consists of funds from 2 percent of national DAU Rp. 2.69 trillion, and Rp infrastructure funds. 0.8 trillion. Thus, the total of all funds derived from the state budget allocated for the Province of Papua in the Fiscal Year 2010 is Rp. 21.89 trillion.
Read More..
Delivery of DIPA has a symbolic meaning that is very important, namely that President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono wants the continuity of development which took place without a break, without stopping, in Papua Province. For that there is no reason to delay implementation of the budget in the form of development activities that have been planned in accordance with the stages according to the applicable government regulations, seriously guided by the principles of budget management is accountable, results-oriented, professional, proportionate , and open / transparent. In his speech President Yudhoyono asked the seriousness of all parties to not accumulate disbursements at year-end budget, but disseminate it more proportional to each quarter. That means that the implementation of the budget must be started early in 2010 so that the role of government budget as a stimulus to the economy actually improved efektifivitasnya.
The entire state budget funds in 2010 amounted to USD 1047.6 Trillion consisting of, the central government budget of Rp 725.2 trillion, and transfers to regional budgets amounted to Rp 322.4 Trillion
Of total central government budget, allocated to them, spending Employees Rp 160.3 trillion, spending Rp 107.0 T goods, capital expenditure Rp 82.1 trillion, social assistance and Rp 64.2 trillion debt interest spending, subsidies and spending Other-Other amounted to Rp 30.7 trillion.
Then the total budget allocation of funds for Papua Province, managed by government agencies is central to Rp 5.78 trillion, with the details, shopping Employees Rp 1.60 trillion, spending Rp 1.29 trillion of goods, capital expenditure Rp 1.95 Trillion , and social assistance Trilyun.Lembaga USD $ 0.92 this year the government allocated a large enough budget is the national education department Rp 0.54 trillion, the department of defense Rp 0.61 trillion, the Ministry of Public Works USD 1.44 Trillion, National Police Rp 0.63 trillion, the Ministry of Health amounted to Rp 0.07 trillion, and the Department of Transportation is Rp 0.65 trillion.
National Education Fund Allocation of them will be used for Social Assistance Institute of Education, Office of Education, Youth and Sports of Papua province to Rp 360.5 billion. Allocation of Department of Public Works of which USD 1.3 Trillion, will be used for the construction of roads and bridges, residential infrastructure development, development of water management and environmental health as well as the settlement of natural resource management and other activities on the field of Public Works.
Allocation of funds National Police will be used mostly for police operations throughout the province of Papua. Department of Health Allocation of funds for other than operational expenditure will also be used for the construction of Jayapura Office of Health Polytechnic of Rp 17.5 billion.
As for the Papua province in the fiscal year 2010 funding was obtained allocations that make up the bulk of the Papua Provincial structure as follows: DAU Rp 11.119 trillion with the details of the Papua Province DAU USD 1.148 trillion and DAU County / City of Rp 9.971 trillion. Then Papua Province DAK Rp 1.5 trillion, with details of the Papua Province DAK Rp 75 billion and DAK County / City of Rp 1.453 trillion. Next fund Otsus Rp. 3.49 trillion, which consists of funds from 2 percent of national DAU Rp. 2.69 trillion, and Rp infrastructure funds. 0.8 trillion. Thus, the total of all funds derived from the state budget allocated for the Province of Papua in the Fiscal Year 2010 is Rp. 21.89 trillion.
Read More..
Sabtu, 02 Januari 2010
Jakarta-Papua talk still possible
Neles Tebay,
Despite the killing of Kelly Kwalik by Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police on Dec.16, 2009, at Timika, the capital of Mimika regeny, Papua, the Indonesian government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Pa-puans have not yet shut down the window for dialogue.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is important for both parties to jointly reach a peaceful and negotiated solution to the Papua conflict. From the Papuans side, they have already demonstrated their commitment and willingness for a peaceful dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
The world has witnessed that during and after the Kwalik's burial in Timika town, Papuans were able to calm themselves. They did not retaliate against the police. There was no atrocity initiated by the Papuans. The Papuans have rejected violent approaches, such as killing, for it will never settle the conflict. They have already chosen dialogue as a civilized way to reach a dignified solution to the Papua conflict.
The Papuans publicly announced they wanted to settle the Papua conflict through a civilized way, through a neutral third party, which will mediate the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Kwalik's assassination has even renewed and strengthened their commitment to dialogue, as clearly communicated in the speech of the chairperson of the Papuan Customary Council (DAP).
It is the belief of the Papuans that the Indonesian authority will not keep repeating its violent approach and therefore choose a civilized way, such as dialogue, to settle the Papua conflict. This belief is based on the fact that the government under the leadership of Yudhoyono has successfully settled the government's armed conflict with the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), through a third party-mediated dialogue with the signing of Helsinki Agreement in August 2005.
Yudhoyono has been reelected for the second term of his presidency. Yudhoyono's reelection gives hope that the government under his leadership will handle the Papua conflict through dialogue with the Papuans, as was done in Aceh.
During his first term, Yudhoyono made several public statements announcing the government's commitment to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue.
However, the promised dialogue has not taken place. The Papuans understood well that the President was not able to initiate a dialogue with them because his political party, the Democratic Party, was new and small. Yudhoyono might have been reluctant to settle the Papuan conflict through dialogue because his political support in the House of Representatives was weak and his attention was focused on the implementation of the Helsinki Agreement in Aceh.
For the second term of his presidency, Yudhoyono has very strong political backing in the House. His political party won the April legislative elections and his party has formed coalition with some other big and influential parties. Therefore, there is less possibility for him to face resistance in the House.
Yudhoyono, at the same time as being the head of state and government, is also the Commander-In-Chief of the Indonesian army.
It is in the second term of his presidency, then, that it seems proper for him to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue as all of the country's power now at his disposal.
Yudhoyono's initiative for the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly be supported by the House, the government, and the Indonesian Military (TNI).
That's why the Papuans see that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is still possible, particularly during Yudhoyono's presidency.
Once the Jakarta-based government engages in dialogue with the Papuans, and the Papua conflict is settled without bloodshed, then this peaceful settlement to the conflict would be the Yudhoyono's legacy.
The history of Indonesia will record and tell that he was the only Indonesian president who was able to settle peacefully and permanently, the Papua conflict through dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
Not like in Aceh, where former vice president Jusuf Kalla was also involved, the peaceful settlement to the Papua conflict is and will be the Yudhoyono's work. It will be recognized his own idea.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will really be considered as a manifestation of the Yudhoyono's genuineness and personal initiative.
As a result, he will be recognized internationally as a man of peace. It may even win him a Nobel Peace Price in the years to come.
It is needless to say that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly bring about a good reputation for the country of Indonesia before the eyes of international community. Therefore there is still hope and possibility for the present government to take the initiative for dialogue to settle the Papua conflict.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur school of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua. Read More..
Despite the killing of Kelly Kwalik by Indonesian Mobile Brigade Police on Dec.16, 2009, at Timika, the capital of Mimika regeny, Papua, the Indonesian government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and the Pa-puans have not yet shut down the window for dialogue.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is important for both parties to jointly reach a peaceful and negotiated solution to the Papua conflict. From the Papuans side, they have already demonstrated their commitment and willingness for a peaceful dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
The world has witnessed that during and after the Kwalik's burial in Timika town, Papuans were able to calm themselves. They did not retaliate against the police. There was no atrocity initiated by the Papuans. The Papuans have rejected violent approaches, such as killing, for it will never settle the conflict. They have already chosen dialogue as a civilized way to reach a dignified solution to the Papua conflict.
The Papuans publicly announced they wanted to settle the Papua conflict through a civilized way, through a neutral third party, which will mediate the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua. Kwalik's assassination has even renewed and strengthened their commitment to dialogue, as clearly communicated in the speech of the chairperson of the Papuan Customary Council (DAP).
It is the belief of the Papuans that the Indonesian authority will not keep repeating its violent approach and therefore choose a civilized way, such as dialogue, to settle the Papua conflict. This belief is based on the fact that the government under the leadership of Yudhoyono has successfully settled the government's armed conflict with the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), through a third party-mediated dialogue with the signing of Helsinki Agreement in August 2005.
Yudhoyono has been reelected for the second term of his presidency. Yudhoyono's reelection gives hope that the government under his leadership will handle the Papua conflict through dialogue with the Papuans, as was done in Aceh.
During his first term, Yudhoyono made several public statements announcing the government's commitment to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue.
However, the promised dialogue has not taken place. The Papuans understood well that the President was not able to initiate a dialogue with them because his political party, the Democratic Party, was new and small. Yudhoyono might have been reluctant to settle the Papuan conflict through dialogue because his political support in the House of Representatives was weak and his attention was focused on the implementation of the Helsinki Agreement in Aceh.
For the second term of his presidency, Yudhoyono has very strong political backing in the House. His political party won the April legislative elections and his party has formed coalition with some other big and influential parties. Therefore, there is less possibility for him to face resistance in the House.
Yudhoyono, at the same time as being the head of state and government, is also the Commander-In-Chief of the Indonesian army.
It is in the second term of his presidency, then, that it seems proper for him to settle the Papua conflict through dialogue as all of the country's power now at his disposal.
Yudhoyono's initiative for the dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly be supported by the House, the government, and the Indonesian Military (TNI).
That's why the Papuans see that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua is still possible, particularly during Yudhoyono's presidency.
Once the Jakarta-based government engages in dialogue with the Papuans, and the Papua conflict is settled without bloodshed, then this peaceful settlement to the conflict would be the Yudhoyono's legacy.
The history of Indonesia will record and tell that he was the only Indonesian president who was able to settle peacefully and permanently, the Papua conflict through dialogue between Jakarta and Papua.
Not like in Aceh, where former vice president Jusuf Kalla was also involved, the peaceful settlement to the Papua conflict is and will be the Yudhoyono's work. It will be recognized his own idea.
A dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will really be considered as a manifestation of the Yudhoyono's genuineness and personal initiative.
As a result, he will be recognized internationally as a man of peace. It may even win him a Nobel Peace Price in the years to come.
It is needless to say that dialogue between Jakarta and Papua will certainly bring about a good reputation for the country of Indonesia before the eyes of international community. Therefore there is still hope and possibility for the present government to take the initiative for dialogue to settle the Papua conflict.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur school of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua. Read More..
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
